Union calls for probe into unsafe operations center

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A police union wants an independent investigation of safety violations at the Indianapolis center that handled emergency operations during the 2012 Super Bowl.

Indianapolis Fraternal Order of Police President Bill Owensby called for the investigation during a news conference Tuesday. He said former Public Safety Director Frank Straub overlooked concerns regarding safety codes so the city could have the center in place for the Super Bowl.

Current Public Safety Director Troy Riggs removed about 150 police and homeland security employees from the 76,000-square-foot center Monday because city fire and building inspectors deemed the building unsafe.

The police officers and Homeland Security officials who worked in the center at the former Eastgate Consumer Mall on the city's east side are setting up shop in other locations across the city.

The city has a 25-year lease worth $18 million with property owner.

Earlier Tuesday, Riggs said the problems include a faulty basement sprinkler system and firewall.

He said he learned about those problems from Department of Code Enforcement and Fire Department officials about 1 p.m. Monday and decided an hour later to evacuate.

"I'm the director of public safety, and I cannot have people in a building that may be unsafe in the event of a fire," he said.

Rent payments were due starting in January, but instead the city has deposited the $59,000 per month in an escrow account until the Public Safety Department could resolve its disagreement with landlord Lifeline Data Centers.

Riggs said his staff has been working on a punchlist of 120 items, but until the recent review by code enforcement and fire inspectors, he believed all issues with the building were cosmetic.

Riggs said he won't try to cancel the lease.

"We think our best course of action is to work with the developer, get these things fixed and get our people back in as soon as possible."


  • Another....
    Another rush job by the city to get ready for the Super Bowl. Remember Georgia Street? I can only imagine the problems that might crop up if we put in another bid.
  • How ironic!
    Good headline for Jay Leno!
  • More Ben Hunter
    If you recall city councilor Ben Hunter was the one who made this deal for the city. He served on the Public Safety committee when this deal was worked. Why isn't Ben Hunter being asked about this? This is exactly the accountability that should be asked for by the citizens of Marion County.
  • LOL - What a headline!
    I'm still giggling!
  • Inspectors?
    Where were the Code Enforcement inspectors when the City money was being spent to build out the improvements?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.