Indiana’s hospitals face Obamacare timing problem

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Obamacare is creating a timing problem for Indiana hospitals.

The delays of the employer mandate penalties that are expected to boost private insurance coverage, along with ongoing negotiations on an expansion of Medicaid in Indiana, mean it will be another year or two before hospitals see the additional revenue the law was supposed to bring them.

The Obama administration, which already said it would not enforce employer taxes for failing to provide affordable health insurance until 2015, issued another year’s delay Feb. 10 for companies with 50 to 99 employees.

Those moves are “credit negative” for not-for-profit hospitals, according to report issued last week by Moody’s Investors Service.

“The delay in the employer mandate causes a timing mismatch between the benefit of fewer uninsured patients and the negative impact hospitals face related to reduced payment updates and cuts to Medicare and Medicaid,” Moody’s analyst Sarah Vennekotter wrote in a Feb. 20 report.

Indeed, Obamacare’s cuts to hospital reimbursement, along with additional cuts passed as part of Congress’ latest budget agreements, are already taking a tangible toll.

Those cuts will total more than $6.5 billion between 2010 and 2019 for the roughly 165 hospitals in Indiana, according to the Indiana Hospital Association. That’s about $654 million per year, on average, over the decade.

Indiana hospitals bring in revenue of roughly $14 billion a year. So the federal cuts equal about 4 percent of hospitals’ net income. But cuts of that magnitude would effectively wipe out hospital profits.

And for rural hospitals, where profit margins are thinner, the cuts are pushing them into the red—if not matched by offsetting expense cuts.

Hospitals have responded with expense cuts. Three of the nation’s largest hospital layoffs last year occurred in Indiana, at Franciscan Alliance, Indiana University Health and St. Vincent Health. And smaller, county-owned hospitals have been cutting, too.

The hospitals facing the biggest reimbursement reductions serve lots of Medicaid patients and previously received “disproportionate share” payments for caring for a higher-than-normal number of poor patients. In Indianapolis, that’s Eskenazi Health, IU Health’s Methodist Hospital and Community Health Network’s East hospital.

But pretty soon, the cuts won’t just be staff; it will be entire services, warned Ed Abel, a hospital accountant at Indianapolis-based Blue & Co. He noted that roughly 20 percent of all Indiana hospitals don’t deliver babies—except in emergencies. Literally, every other year, more hospitals join that list.

“Sooner or later, whether they like it or not, they are going to have to consider whether they can continue to perform all the services they do,” Abel said.

The Obamacare cuts are difficult because they are certain, Abel said, while the benefits of coverage expansion can’t be quantified yet.

In Massachusetts, which passed a system similar to Obamacare in 2006, employer-sponsored coverage had increased 1 percentage point by 2013, even as the rest of the nation saw a 5.7-point decline in employer coverage, according to a report by the PricewaterhouseCoopers consulting firm.

Also, Indiana hospitals are hoping Gov. Mike Pence can make a deal with the Obama administration to expand the Healthy Indiana Plan, which would expand health insurance coverage to an estimated 182,000 Hoosiers with incomes below the federal poverty line.

If both those things happen, Abel said, hospital revenues should remain roughly where they were before Obamacare—depending on which hospital you’re talking about.

“There are some hospital executives that feel like it will result in an increase in payment, and there are some that think it will result in a decrease in payment. It’s kind of a glass-half-full, glass-half-empty sort of thing,” Abel. “The problem is, we don’t really know how much is being poured into the glass.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!