IBJNews

Industrial market shows strength but faces challenges

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Stronger leasing activity in the first half of 2010 provided some optimism that the local industrial-space market is recovering from a down year in 2009. But brokers remain cautious about how the year will come in thanks to several big lease expirations that will dump space on the market in the second half.

About 2.5 million square feet of industrial space is expected to hit the market between now and the end of the year, according to mid-year reports from CB Richard Ellis, Summit Realty Group and NAI Olympia Partners. Most of that is due to companies vacating space in Plainfield in the region’s southwest submarket.

The return of large spaces to the market because of companies vacating space is relatively new here, Jeremy G. Woods, a Summit executive vice president specializing in the industrial market, said in the report. Previously, new space built on spec was what typically put upward pressure on vacancies.

The biggest loss for the market is John Deere, which is vacating 925,000 square feet at 800 Perry Road in Plainfield. The space is being offered for sublease by CB Richard Ellis until Deere’s lease expires in September 2012. Deere reorganized its supply chain and is now using several smaller distribution centers around the country.

Other tenants vacating space moved or consolidated within the Indianapolis market. Cantrell Logistics, for example, moved from Park 100 to Mount Comfort Commercial Park in Greenfield.

Fastenal left one location in the northwest submarket but expanded its facility on Guion Road by adding a new warehouse and automated retrieval system.

The moves are driven in large part by companies under pressure to control costs or downsize that are taking advantage of the fact it’s still a tenant’s market, said Mark Writt, a senior vice president of CB Richard Ellis who focuses on the industrial market.   

“Tenants are able to relocate into better quality facilities at competitive lease rates and improve their efficiency and their occupancy costs,” Writt said.

With an industrial vacancy rate between 9.5 percent and 10.7 percent depending on who’s doing the counting, the market here remains in attractive shape compared with that of other cities, where vacancy rates exceeding 15 percent aren’t uncommon.

The relatively healthy occupancy levels can work against landlords here in one respect. Writt said logistics companies that are trying to get rid of overcapacity might be more likely to vacate space here, where they think they’ll have a better chance of subleasing it.

The large number of pending vacancies means that to avoid losing ground the market will have to sustain the growth in leasing activity that has happened so far this year.

NAI Olympia Partners, whose report dealt strictly with bulk warehouse space, said more than 3.8 million square feet of bulk warehouse deals were completed through the first half of the year, compared with 2 million square feet for all of 2009.

Among the biggest deals: Case New Holland’s renewal of its 1.1-million-square-foot lease in Lebanon and Johnson & Johnson’s purchase of 115 acres for a 1.1 million-square-foot warehouse in Plainfield.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT