Indy downtown promoters to pay busted youth group

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A not-for-profit that promotes downtown Indianapolis has apologized to a youth group whose cookie sale was shut down in a sweep of unauthorized food vendors.

Indianapolis Downtown Inc. spokesman Bob Schultz said Sunday the Christ Church Cathedral youth group wasn't among authorized food vendors during the Circle of Lights lighting ceremony on Monument Circle that drew tens of thousands of people Friday night.

Indianapolis Downtown acknowledged Sunday it asked code enforcement officials to shut down unauthorized vendors. A city ordinance adopted for the 2012 Super Bowl requires city permits for sidewalk vendors during downtown events.

Christ Church, located on the Circle since 1857, has been giving away hot chocolate and selling cookies as a youth group fundraiser at the event for decades. The bags of cookies sold for $1 this year.

The cookie sale typically raises about $1,000, but officials of the Episcopal church say sales totaled about $600 when halted.

Schultz says Indianapolis Downtown will pay the difference to the group.


  • IDI
    Remember folks this is the same group that directly or indirectly spent $15,000.00 to rent a fake ice rink for a couple days on Georgia Street. I guess it escaped them there are not one but two permanent olympic size ice rinks on Georgia St.
  • Almighty NFL
    Sounds like something the NFL pushes for to protect their sponsors. Does the city still need to bow down to the NFL if there is no Super Bowl this year?
  • Ridiculous
    I can understand vendors selling things on city property, but if stores have permits for sidewalk vending, like Starbucks probably does have, that should cover this. In addition, the church owns their own property. It should be within their rights to sell items if it wishes, or to take donations, on their own property. If nothing else, it should be grandfathered. Sounds to me like a bit of overkill on the city's part.
  • Health Violation
    Food vendors have to get checked by the Health Department. Do we know that the Health Department has ever checked the basement of the church to make sure it is safe?
  • It's always about the money
    If it's a youth group affiliated with the church that happens to own the land on Monument Circle since 1857, they shouldn't have to have any authorization to have a fundraiser in their own front yard.
  • Fall from grace
    IBJ's woman of the year became the Grinch this Friday. The Ordinance needs to go and Starbucks should also be compensated.
  • Outdated ordinance?
    Why is an ordinance created for the Super Bowl nearly two years ago still in effect? Street vendors add to a city's personality and vitality and shouldn't be over-regulated.
  • Their own property
    They were handing out free cocoa and selling cookies on their own property -- not selling on city property.
  • why the exception?
    Just curious. If the youth group was not an authorized vendor and all unauthorized vendors were shut down, then why the exception? What am I missing here? Does the law state that if it is a youth group affiliated with a church then it does not have to be authorized??

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

    5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing