IndyCar brings in outsider as new race director

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Beaux Barfield has become the latest lieutenant enlisted by IndyCar Series CEO Randy Bernard in his effort to install his own regime and rebuild the open-wheel racing series.

Barfield was introduced Wednesday at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway as the replacement for Brian Barnhart, who has been the series' race official dating back to the beginning of the Indy Racing League in 1996.

As race director, Barfield will be the IZOD IndyCar Series’ chief competition official, overseeing on-track race decisions and enforcing rules and procedural issues.

Barfield comes to the IndyCar Series at a critical time. In addition to trying to increase its sponsorship revenue, attendance and television ratings, the series will unveil a new chassis and engine for the first time in nine years this year.

“This is a critical position from a safety, competition and spectator standpoint,” said Zak Brown, president of Zionsville-based motorsports marketing firm Just Marketing International and a former race car driver. “With the new chassis and engine packages coming out, it will be even more critical in terms of governing the technical specifications. It’s not just about dropping the green and checkered flags.”

The October season-ending accident in Las Vegas that killed two-time Indianapolis 500 champion Dan Wheldon also puts the series under a microscope.

“I think whoever has this job will be scrutinized closely,” said Mike Hull, managing director of Target Chip Ganassi Racing. “IndyCar people are attention-to-detail people, and it may be more so this year. Whoever has that job will earn his money.”

Barnhart has long been a controversial figure in the series, but became a lightning rod this year when he started a race in the rain that led to an accident and started another race with several safety trucks on the track leading to multiple near misses.

Barfield, 40, comes to IndyCar from the American Le Mans Series. He is a former racer who started in go-karts before advancing to the Formula 2000 and later CART’s Indy Lights Series.

Barfield joined Champ Car’s officiating crew in 2003 and became race director for Le Mans in 2008.

If there’s one knock on IndyCar’s new race director, it’s his relative lack of experience, said Brown, who raced alongside Barfield in the Formula 2000 series.
“They don’t race ovals in ALMS, so he doesn’t have much experience there, and he’s pretty young,” Brown said. “He will have to jump right into ovals with the Indianapolis 500.”

Bernard has been courting Barfield for several weeks and said he's confident he has the right experience.

“Though Beaux’s most recent experience is in sports car racing, his roots are in open-wheel racing,” Bernard said.

“I grew up around racing, so I’ve been involved in it all my life,” Barfield said. “The one thing that I wanted to do as a race driver growing up in America was to be involved with the Indy 500. When my driving career took a change of course and I found myself officiating, it was still a goal of mine to get to Indy car racing and the Indy 500. In that regard, it represents the pinnacle of my aspirations as a race official. I’m truly honored to be a part of IndyCar.”

Chris Mower, Panther Racing team manager, said Barfield’s lack of IndyCar experience is a good thing.

“Consistency and fairness are the key things,” Mower said. “Every team owner and driver have to be treated the same. I think being brought in from the outside will help with that. The hardest part of his job will be standing up to the owners and drivers. That’s never been easy. He’ll need Randy Bernard’s 100-percent backing to stand up to the pressures of this job and make the difficult calls he needs to make.”



  • A Tale of Two Series
    One was popular and prosperous for the owners. The other, not.
  • For Whom the Bell Tolls
    ding ding IMS it tolls for thee
  • Not with a Bang, but a Whimper.
    You go Beaux....no really....just go.
    The once proud pre '96, former shell of another shell, of some previous shell, open wheel series destroyed by a megalomaniac. Like a hollow june bug shell grasping an evergreen in death, the irlcar series looks alive on the outside to the misinformed, but is dead to the core on the inside.
    Outside of some of the paid irlcar shills still puking the series out in the media every day for some god unknown reason, who knew this god forsaken series still existed
    (outside of us who had the the macabre, wheldon death - media blitz force fed to us).
    It's quite a shame....a sad, pathetic, dead shame that this is the way the series ends.
    With apologies to TS Eliot....
    This is the way the series ends, the series ends, the series ends, not with a bang but a whimper.
  • That new Ritters
    where the turn four stands used to be is becoming more likely ever day.
  • Former CART official?
    You all realize the only goofy parts left of this sad-sack series are the parts the IRL brought to the equation back in 1996, right?

    What was the IRL anyway? How can anyone not conclude it was designed to destroy the sport?

    2012 would have bee a great year (with a new car) to re-market the "NEW" series....but IRL blew that in 2008. And now, with Wheldon's passing and series in DEATHBLOW 2012 mode, what is left to salvage from this homogenized waste?

  • Does it matter?
    Optimism is futile. Short of another headline making race car driver death, this series is of no particular note or interest to all but a small, select group of aging, middle-class white men of bursting beltloop. The new hire will not matter. End is close by. Enjoy the final few "500's". I concur with the Burl.
  • Barnhart had oval experience
    Didn't do Dan Wheldon any good

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing