IBJNews

Kitchen incubator celebrates graduation of first user

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indy’s Kitchen, a local incubator dedicated to helping launch food-related small businesses, announced on Wednesday that it graduated its first client.

Located at 2442 Central Ave., Indy’s Kitchen provides a fully equipped, commercially licensed pastry and catering kitchen for rent by the hour to aspiring entrepreneurs to help them grow their businesses.

Avec Moi, a company that prepares meals to go from Indy’s Kitchen, is moving to a permanent home at 701 E. 62nd St. Owner Kris Parmelee credited the facility with providing the opportunity to test the market and build a customer base before branching out on her own.

“Indy’s Kitchen has given me the support I’ve needed to grow at the right pace,” she said in a prepared statement. “Its location in the thriving Fall Creek area has allowed me to connect to a community and build vital relationships with customers.”

Avec Moi will open in its new space on May 16.

About 30 small companies use Indy's Kitchen to teach cooking classes, hold private events and prepare a variety of food that is delivered for catered events or sold to customers in local shops. Space is available for rent 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Indy’s Kitchen also helps connect food entrepreneurs to potential suppliers, customers and community resources that can provide help with financing and insurance, business plan development, and food safety and labeling regulations.

In conjunction with the graduation of its first client, the city of Indianapolis awarded Indy’s Kitchen a $17,000 grant. It will be used to help clients create business and marketing plans, and provide a revolving loan fund for start-up and growth capital.

Founded in 2010, Indy’s Kitchen is owned by Linda Gilkerson, William Powell, Paul Pickett and Tom Abeel.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT