IBJNews

INSIDE DISH: H2O owners return with new strategy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Inside Dish

Welcome back to IBJ’s video feature “Inside Dish: The Business of Running Restaurants.”

Our subject this week is H2O Sushi, founded in 2000 by Mike Sylvia and chef Greg Hardesty and now a mainstay along Broad Ripple Avenue. In 2005, Sylvia and Hardesty sold the Asian-themed restaurant to Eli and Nicole Anderson, married chefs who had met while working at Hardesty's downtown eatery Elements.

"I thought it was the next step in life," Eli said of the purchase, which he priced "in the mid-$100,000s."

Over four years, the Andersons netted between 2 percent and 6 percent profit annually, with a high watermark for sales of $625,000 in 2007. But by 2008, they began to buckle under the intense demands of operating a restaurant with three young children at home. With new career plans in hand, they sold H2O to neophyte restaurateur Chris Choi in 2009.

But Eli, 34, and Nicole, 31, eventually would return. Eli's plans for a more conventional 9-to-5 position with a focus on accounting fell through, so the Andersons took some time to evaluate their next move and investigate developing another eatery. Early this year, Choi offered to resell them H2O.

"I just don't think he [Choi] knew what he was getting into at that time," said Eli, who declined to reveal either the sale or repurchase price. He said Choi, a native of South Korea, reportedly has left the country and left no contact information.

With a fresh perspective on H2O, the Andersons are set on making major changes, from completely rebranding the restaurant to simply refocusing the cuisine and bringing down the average check price. In the video below, Eli details the option of deemphasizing sushi and branching into "neo-Asian comfort food." The shift, however it manifests itself, likely will take place by August. In an even more aggressive move, the Andersons also plan to begin offering lunch.



 

x
x
x
H2O Sushi
x
1912 Broad Ripple Ave.
x
(317) 254-0677
x
x
www.h2osushibar.com
x
x
x
Concept: Eclectic mix of traditional sushi style and modern flavor combinations, with other Asian-inspired dishes with American and French influences.
x
Founded: By Mike Sylvia and chef Greg Hardesty in 2000
x
Owners: Eli and Nicole Anderson, who originally purchased the restaurant from Sylvia and Hardesty in 2005. They sold the restaurant in July 2009, and then repurchased it from the new owner, Chris Choi, in March 2010.
x
Start-up costs: $40,000 for the most recent ownership switch, which includes licensing, legal and architectural fees, and anticipated costs for marketing, new kitchen equipment, an updated website, and refocusing the restaurant's identity by diversifying the menu or completely rebranding.
x
Sales/profit: From 2005-2009, the restaurant netted between 2 percent and 6 percent profit annually, Eli Anderson said. The restaurant's best year was 2007, with $625,000 in sales. Anticipated sales for March-December 2010 are $500,000, with 2 percent to 4 percent profit.
x
Seating: 54
x
Goals: Options for reestablishing the restaurant's identity include deemphasizing sushi and branching into "neo-Asian comfort food," such as soups, noodle dishes and dim sum. The Andersons also plan to start offering lunch in addition to dinner.
x
Good to know: The Andersons have three children, ages 6, 4 and 2.
x
x
x
ADVERTISEMENT

  • It doesn't suck.
    It doesn't suck. It's extremely cash intensive, its exhausting, its unpredictable, and it is sometimes just brutal. Like every business, the "profit" comes in many forms, and for people who love this business, the rewards are great. Best of luck Eli, Nicole, and John.
  • Yes, Profit.
    Net profit does not include owner's discretionary cash flow. Add back depreciation, personal expenses, owners wages, benefits and a host of other business related expenses that one would personally encounter that the business pays for and you will begin to understand why people choose to own a business. If they can control their variable costs and keep fixed costs to a minimum they should be very profitable!
  • Sushi
    I hope they don't "deemphasize" the sushi too much. They have the best sushi in town.
  • Profit?
    So they are expecting to make a $10k-$20k profit for the last 9 months of the year? That hardly seems worth the effort, risk and investment.

    Even in their "best" year they made at most $37k. The restaurant business sucks.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now

    ADVERTISEMENT