Instability takes toll at WRTV

Marc D. Allan
September 25, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Don Lundy’s first day at WRTV-TV Channel 6 started with viewers in an uproar because the station’s previous general manager had axed popular weatherman Bob McLain as part of a salary dump. Nine years later, as Lundy prepares to retire, he thinks—hopes—he has a plan that leaves the local ABC affiliate far better than he found it and poised to grow.

Specifically, Lundy points to his new anchors, Chris Pisano in the morning and Todd Connor at night, and new morning meteorologist Julia Sandstrom, who he believes bring “gravitas” to their broadcasts. He cites research showing that viewers like the station’s aggressive, consumer-oriented reporting, and says that after years of spending little on external promotions, Channel 6 now roughly matches its competitors.

“I do think we have a good story,” the 64-year-old Lundy said, “and it feels good to retire after 30-plus years with McGraw-Hill on such a high note.”

Lundy Lundy

For the first two weeks of September, at least, Lundy’s right. The station’s news ratings are up 11 percent to 29 percent compared with July viewership.

Competitors and observers, however, will tell you WRTV’s ratings had nowhere to go but up. The station remains mired in third place during most newscasts—and sometimes fourth in the mornings. Even at 7 p.m., when Channel 6 has the only local newscast, it’s far behind “Wheel of Fortune” on WTHR-TV Channel 13 and even trails “Inside Edition” on WISH-TV Channel 8.

They also will tell you that, after years of turnover—Todd Connor is the station’s third male nighttime anchor since Clyde Lee left in 2001—Channel 6 has a lot of work to do to re-establish the strong identity it had in the 1990s.

“Indy is not a Sun Belt market where you have a lot of people moving into the market and an opportunity to win viewers just because they’re new,” said Rick Gevers, a locally based agent for on-air news people (none currently on Channel 6).

“Here, a lot of people have grown up watching particular people and like them and continue to do that. So instability has probably been one of the things WRTV has struggled with over the years.”

The ratings are a drag on WRTV, since advertising during local newscasts typically generates 40 percent to 60 percent of a network affiliate’s revenue. Ad rates vary based on myriad factors, including the strength of lead-in programming. But buying a 30-second spot on Channel 6’s 11 p.m. news in November would cost roughly $500, the station said. The same time on market leader WTHR would cost $1,500, a Channel 13 spokesman said.

Talent exodus

Lundy said Channel 6 still has plenty of work to do, and he also looks back at work that should have been done. He took over a station that had Oprah at 4 p.m. but let her go to Channel 13.

“I wish I had been here when we had her show,” he said. “I would have fought really hard to keep it.” (He does have “Judge Judy,” the No. 2 show from 4-5 p.m. weekdays, signed through 2013.)

Around the time “The Oprah Winfrey Show” moved across the dial, Channel 6 lost Clyde Lee, Diane Willis and sports anchor Ed Sorenson, and McLain was unceremoniously cut. That left Channel 6 with an all-new anchor team.

That was just the beginning of the turnover that saw the station swap veterans for younger, presumably less-expensive talent.

Channel 6 chart“Since 2001, WRTV has had 15 anchor changes—that includes morning and weekend anchors, sports anchors and meteorologists,” Lee said in an e-mail that listed names including Paul Poteet, Martha Weaver and, most recently, Todd Wallace. “There may be more—but at least 15 changes in nine years. That is an incredible number of changes in a news operation during that time span.”

While Channel 6 benefits from some of the best and best-known TV reporters in the city, including Jack Rinehart, Norman Cox and Rafael Sanchez, “the churning of personnel as ‘front line’ staff makes it difficult to retain loyal viewers,” Lee added. “It makes it even more of a factor when you take into account that the other news operations in the market have been very stable.”

Lundy acknowledged as much.

“This is a town that really values stability,” he said. “That caused some issues for us.”

Big-city experience

The station’s new anchors all come from large markets. Todd Connor reported and anchored for Fox News and ABC News. He also has Midwestern roots: He’s an Illinoisan who’s worked in Terre Haute and South Bend. Morning anchor Chris Pisano comes from Kansas City, and morning weather anchor Julia Sandstrom has worked in Seattle and San Francisco.

Bringing in experienced anchors is part of the station’s new aggressiveness. Lundy said that trait can be traced to the appointment of Darrell Brown as president of McGraw-Hill Broadcasting in July 2008. New York-based McGraw-Hill owns four stations—in San Diego, Denver, Indianapolis and Bakersfield, Calif.

“He brought a discipline to the station group of spending money on customer research and outside promotion to increase ‘share of voice’ in the market,” Lundy said. “That, along with support for some personnel hires, have been positives.”

Lundy said WRTV previously wasn’t “as aggressive as we could have been” in doing research and “had been significantly outspent by our competitors in outside promotion.

“That’s not happening anymore,” he added. “I would, in hindsight, blame myself for not pushing for more research.”

Research, he said, has revealed, among other things, that viewers like the “watchdog” reporting done by established veterans like Rafael Sanchez and Norman Cox as well as relative newcomers Joanna Massee and Kara Kenney.

And with strong entertainment programming throughout the day (including the addition of Oprah acolyte Nate Berkus at 10 a.m. and ABC’s strong prime-time lineup), Lundy said the station is now in the midst of what it has needed to do for a while: Do the research, devise a plan, put the plan in place, and monitor to make sure it’s going well.

Inside the newsroom, the staff remains hopeful.

“We embrace the changes that will make us better,” said Sanchez, the union steward for the station’s reporters and a 12-year employee of Channel 6. “We want to succeed. If these folks can help us, then fantastic.”

Clyde Lee, who spent 25 years at Channel 6 and now owns a public relations firm with wife Diane Willis, said he hopes to see some stability at his old station. But he also expects the new general manager who takes over for Lundy early next year to have his own agenda—which could mean more change.

“Change is good, but not at the expense of viewer loyalty,” Lee said. “Diane and I still have loyalty for and friendships at Channel 6, and we wish them well.”•


  • WRTV let the wrong anchor go
    Unfortunately management let the wrong weather anchor go! JULIA SANDSTROM was a real professional and a real asset to WRTV. I have known Julia personally since he early 1990's and here is no finer professional weather anchor around. We followered her in Spokane, Seattle, San Francisco and Back to Spokane before she came to Indianapolis and brought CLASS to your station. I enjoyed coming to Indianapolis and watching her do the morning weather and she was so much more professional than the other early morning anchors. Management's decision on on this termination was JUST WRONG !!!!
    Why has the poor management been allowed to stay. The results and poor ratings speak clearly.
  • poor management
    I think it is amazing how the poor management has nearly ran this station out of indianapolis. They have had great talent in the past only to run them off and make them feel unappreciated. Ed sorensen had a killer sports show and even better sunday late night sports show. He was shown the door and now WRTV wonders why they are stuck in third place and sometimes even fourth place after all these years. WRTV in my mind is nothing more than a training ground to prepare yourself for bigger and much better things. I seldom watch. sad
  • Rude reporting doesn't get it
    I think in todays society we really need tough people that work as hard as kara, we live in a world of tramatic situations that require kara's hard work, she has so much to deal with everyday that she is no pitbull! Just doing her job the best way possible.
  • craming phone bill
    WHAT is the 'FBI' toll free HOTLINE PHONE #
  • P.S.
    I love the smell of Gravitas in the morning.
  • Watchdogs
    Shouldn't they be called Un-Watched Dogs?
  • Watchdog or Pit Bull?
    "Research has revealed that viewers like the watchdog reporting.." Oh really? Then why has WRTV sunk to the bottom of local news ratings ever since they adopted their in your face, pit bull style of news reporting?
  • Pitbulls
    Kara Kenney and Joanna Massey both epitomize the "gotcha" journalism so prevalent today. Take quotes out of context, try to make subjects look bad, cameras zooming in and out. Ridiculous. I agree with David. They call them watchdogs. My wife and I call them pitbulls.
    • miss the old morning crew
      I enjoyed Dan, Paul (Crystal was OK) and Tom in the mornings along with Grace. I dont need 100% serious news when I'm waking up in the morning. I enjoyed the silly stuff they would do...I don't need 'gravitas'. I can't stand the new weather person in the AM either.
    • WRTV Anchors
      I was wondering what the heck was going on with this station in the morning. I only look at the channel 6 news because I like Grace Trahan. I had gotten used to the other anchors. At this point I am ready to switch channels for some stability. If they get rid of Grace, I'm definitely gone.
    • Rafael Sanchez the PARASITE
      It seems like they need to go out and find the "parasite" guy again for November sweeps... his commercials are always awesome.
    • Rude reporting doesn't get it
      Kara Kenney has quickly established herself as a pitbull when it comes to her "style" of reporting. Her stories on schools are often completely unresearched, accusatory and just plain rude. A little more tact and listening on her part would help.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

    2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

    3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

    4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

    5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.