Insurers ordered to appear at Frankfort hearing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Major health insurers are being ordered to a hearing in Frankfort, Ky., next month to explain why they are eliminating child-only policies.

Indiana's largest health insurer, Indianapolis-based Anthem, as well as Louisville-based Humana are among the companies scheduled to attend the Oct. 13 hearing called by state officials.

The companies say they decided to stop selling child-only policies partly because of the new health reform law, which requires them to accept children with pre-existing medical conditions.

Insurers said many parents might have waited until children were very sick before buying coverage, with the addition of many chronically ill children driving up premiums for other customers.

Some insurers said their moves were prompted by the decisions of competitors to stop selling child-only plans, putting them at a competitive disadvantage, The Courier-Journal reported Wednesday.

Kentucky Insurance Commissioner Sharon Clark issued the order to the insurers, saying in a statement that she was concerned it could adversely affect children with health problems.

She also expressed concern about the impact of the insurers' actions on Kentucky Access, the state's high-risk insurance pool.

Clark said it would "prove disasterous" if Kentucky Access were forced to take on several hundred children per month.

Although insurers are no longer offering new child-only policies, they will continue to cover children who have existing policies as well as to accept children with pre-existing conditions under new family policies.

According to Obama administration officials, between 100,000 and 700,000 children nationwide are covered by child-only policies.

In Kentucky and Indiana, Humana reports that its 1 million members include about 1,200 with child-only policies.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?