IBJNews

Interchange project changes retail prospects on west side

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Land at the Waterfront Office Park that sat vacant for decades is now ripe for retail development thanks to the reconfiguration of a west-side Indianapolis interstate interchange.

Property at the south end of the office complex, along U.S. 136, was a little off the beaten path until the state’s Accelerate 465 project drastically altered the makeup of the intersection where interstates 465 and 74 meet near Crawfordsville Road.

The road project concluded in the last month, rerouting traffic that once spilled directly onto Crawfordsville Road onto 136 instead.

Ted Kleinmaier and his son, Keith, owners of Retail Realty Inc., and another investor placed their bet on the property in March 2008 after plans for the interchange alteration were announced. They bought 2.13 acres at the northwest corner of Waterfront Parkway West Drive and 136 from an Ohio investor and sat on it until the road project took shape.

In February the bet started to pay off. They sold half  the property to a local partnership that is in the process of getting city approval to build a BP/Ricker’s gas station and convenience store. It also will incorporate a restaurant, possibly a Subway.

Ted Kleinmaier says he and his partners sold that parcel for what they paid for the entire piece more than four years ago. Even considering carrying costs and a rezoning, he figures they made out OK.

“We thought at the time we bought it, 'It'll take time, but down the road it should be a good investment.’ I don’t think we would have had much interest without [the road project],” Kleinmaier said. He thinks the rest of the land would be suitable for a small hotel or a restaurant.

Immediately east of Kleinmaier’s property, another four acres along 136 is now in play. Ross Reller, a land broker for the local office of Colliers International, has 1.36-acre and 2.6-acre sites listed.

The smaller parcel is owned by a dentist who had considered building an office there. It’s closest to where traffic exits 465 and is listed for $575,000.

The larger piece is owned by Hamilton Center Inc., a Vigo County not-for-profit that provides mental health services. Reller said Hamilton Center got the property years ago, possibly as a gift, and has been waiting patiently for it to become more marketable. It’s listed for $395,000.

He figures the interchange fix is exactly what was needed. Previously, motorists coming off 74 and 465 directly onto Crawfordsville Road quickly came upon Crawfordsville Road’s intersection with High School Road. The retail node there was too close to the off ramp for motorists to safely consider their options, Reller said.

“You didn’t have time to make a decision whether to go north or south on High School Road," he said.

Reller said interest in his listings has picked up since the road project ended. “We think people were watching and waiting to see how things functioned” once the new interchange opened.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What a mess!
    This interchange is considerably worse than it was before they "improved" it. I would go as far as saying that the new interchange is even less safe than the old cloverleaf configuration, which is saying a lot. Trucks merging from 465 north onto 74 west are often stuck in the right lane for miles before they can safely merge into the slow lane. I keep hoping that one day I will drive through and some miraculous change will have occurred overnight rendering the whole tangle of roadway more logical. With each passing day that possibility seems more remote. At least the real estate investors are happy.
  • Misuse of public resources
    Great! we spent millions and millions of dollars destroying this area and remakign it all for a gas station and subway restaurant........sounds like positive economic development to me. I can't wait to see all the promising businesses that go in along new terrain I-69!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A non-compete clause is expected to keep Buchman from appearing on-air at WTHR for a year from the WISH contract’s expiration.

  2. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  3. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  4. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  5. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

ADVERTISEMENT