IPS says outside audits confirm budget surplus

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two outside financial audits confirmed what Indianapolis Public Schools Superintendent Lewis Ferebee declared in March: IPS has been operating with a surplus rather than a deficit.

The audits—conducted at Ferebee’s request by the State Board of Accounts and the Council for Great City Schools—confirmed that IPS had a surplus last year of $8.4 million. By contrast, IPS reported a $30 million deficit in early 2013, when the district was under the leadership of interim superintendent Peggy Hinckley.

The different conclusions came because IPS budgeted expenditures for 2013 that were nearly $40 million higher than what the district actually spent. And, according to Ferebee, the district did not do any reconciliation between its projections and its actual spending.

“This also confirms that the budget deficits were a longstanding district practice,” Ferebee told reporters on Tuesday.

The audit by the Council of Great City Schools noted that in 11 of the past 12 years, IPS’s projected expenditures were substantially higher than its actual spending. That left IPS with an average cash balance each year of $57 million, or 25 percent of its general fund.

By contrast, the median cash surplus among 34 school districts that are part of the Council of Great City Schools is 11 percent of general funds.

Those cash balances are maintained in cash accounts, rather than being placed in higher-yielding investments. Ferebee said his staff would work to develop a policy on how much the district needs to keep in cash reserves and, if it holds more than that, to place it in long-term investments.

“We need to invest some of our resources in a better fashion,” Ferebee said.

In spite of the more positive financial picture, Ferebee said he’s moving ahead on various efforts to trim expenses, including the possible sale of IPS busing, warehouse and media facilities. The budget deficit was the basis for IPS’s decision to lay off 100 employees last year, and it played a role in the district's decision in February to terminate 23 administrators.

IPS is working to change the way teachers are paid, possibly paying some teachers more. Negotiations between IPS and its teachers’ union begin on Aug. 1.

Ferebee also said he has started discussions with state education leaders to ask for four "turnaround" schools that were placed in 2012 into the hands of charter schools operators to be given back to IPS.


  • Fund Balances
    Is the audit available to the public? There are two VERY big questions not addressed in the press reporting: 1) in which funds the balances reside (Gen Fund was only implied, but not specifically stated); and 2) whether any of the reserves are due to non-recurring revenue, one-time savings, or expenses shifted out past end of the reporting period. The issue of which fund balances is particularly important with regard to IPS fiscal strength. If the reserve balances are building in dedicated funds, with tightly restricted allowable uses, then they aren't of much help to IPS in covering general operating expenses. If IPS has truly been building large Gen Fund reserves over the past few years, somebody's got a lot of questions to answer!!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing