IPS chief declares $30M budget deficit a mirage

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In one swoop Tuesday night, Lewis Ferebee, the new superintendent of Indianapolis Public Schools, made the district’s budget woes vanish.

Ferebee unveiled the results of his analysis of IPS finances by saying a previously determined $30 million structural budget deficit wasn’t real, but was instead the result of a “budgeting tactic” used by his predecessors.

“IPS has over-projected expenses to maintain a functional cash balance,” IPS officials said in a statement released after Tuesday’s meeting of the IPS school board. “The district has operated under a budgeted deficit, rather than an actual deficit.”

Ferebee’s analysis found that the 2013 budget projected $244 million in funding but $274.4 million in expenses, creating a deficit of $30.4 million.

But some of those expenses were for projects that never actually occurred, such as the expansion of pre-kindergarten programs, the creation of a new science school and the hiring of new employees.

The system's actual 2013 expenses totaled $237.8 million, while its revenue totaled $246.2 million.

That produced a 2013 surplus of $8.4 million, according to Ferebee’s analysis, which will be reviewed by an independent accounting firm.

IPS announced it had a $30 million structural deficit about a year ago, when the district was being led by interim superintendent Peggy Hinckley. The budget deficit was the basis for IPS’ decision to lay off 100 employees last year, and it played a role in IPS’ decision last month to terminate 23 administrators.

Ferebee gave no indication Tuesday that any of those decisions would be reversed in light of the new budget, but he did indicate that raises could now be considered for IPS teachers and staff.

Yet, even before the structural deficit was announced, then-Superintendent Eugene White frequently cited budget concerns as he made decisions to close some IPS schools and lay off employees.

In interviews Tuesday night with the education web site Chalkbeat Indiana, both Hinckley and White defended their analyses of IPS’ finances. Hinckley questioned whether Ferebee was jumping to an incorrect conclusion.

“He has no experience as a superintendent and no experience with funding in Indiana,” Hinckley told Chalkbeat Indiana. “I don’t understand how they could have fewer expenditures by that much money.”


  • Truth Hurts uh.....
    This is 100% right. IPS has built no new schools or programs in 25 years. Most IPS schools did not even have air conditioning. I went to IPS (1989) AND worked at IPS (in the 1990s). Teachers never earned "big money" at IPS. It's good to see that someone has gone over the IPS books and seen that this is a sham. People(WIBC) are making the IPS chief to be "loony" because he has gone over the books and is reporting what he is seeing. They ALWAYS do Blacks this way -- when we speck the truth, they just don't want to hear it. Sad. But it's just like that famous line -- they can't handle the truth, lol. IPS wants Shortridge High School to be for Whites. They are sending the Shortridge High School principal (who is Black) to a "troubled" Black IPS school because the Shortridge High School principal has worked hard and is getting good results at Shortridge High School. IPS wants to send the Black Shortridge High School principal to the "bad" IPS school and let a the bad IPS school's White principal come in and be principal at Shortridge High School. Wow. Not cool. Race @ work. truth is truth. people need to stop hiding behind lies and LIVE the Golden Rule.
  • Momma Mia
    Do you think these guys could make my finances have a 30 Million surplus....sigh?
  • Auditors?
    Does IPS not have external auditors reviewing their books????
  • IPS
    Wait a minute...time for the State Board of Accounts to come in. This is taxpayer $$$ and this really sounds on the surface to be a bait and switch. Is there $$ that has been spent for illgotten gains? Or to manipulate the taxpayers into more taxes or an lillegal termination of positions? This really stinks

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.