IBJNews

IU economists: Slow growth expected in 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Economic growth will remain sluggish into next year as companies remain hesitant to add jobs, Indiana University economists said Thursday morning during their annual forecast.

“The past year has been one of disappointingly weak recovery, and sadly, we expect that 2011 will bring more of the same,” said Bill Witte, an associate professor of economics at IU.

The private sector lost more than 7 million jobs during the recession, which many economists say ended in June 2009. The number of unemployed has continued to grow since, Witte said.

Nationally, the unemployment rate in September was 9.6 percent, lower than Indiana’s rate of 10.1 percent.

Still, Jerry Conover, director of IU’s Business Research Center, expects Indiana to add jobs next year. The Hoosier state ranks fifth nationally in terms of job growth in 2010 and has regained about 18 percent of the jobs it lost. Most of the gains have been in private education and health care services, as well as in public-sector employment.

“Employment will continue to grow,” Witte said. “Even so, you won’t have enough growth to make a lot of progress against unemployment.

Payroll growth next year will remain at about its current 2 percent level, which would translate to about 50,000 new jobs, Conover said. But state unemployment likely will remain above 9 percent for most of 2011, he predicted.

“The increase is from a very weak base level,” he said. “We probably won’t hit pre-recession peak employment until 2013 or beyond.”

In Indianapolis, job growth in 2011 could be slightly better, between 2 percent and 3 percent, but still significantly below pre-recession levels, the panel predicted at its forecast held at the downtown Columbia Club.

Overall, the panel said the national economy will grow next year at a rate of about 3 percent.

“This will be a little better than 2010, but not enough to make much progress against the damage done during the recession,” Witte said.

Other highlights from the forecast:

— Hoosiers’ personal incomes will rise moderately, at a pace of about 3.5 percent.

— Inflation will be low, below 1 percent, as consumer spending rises very slowly.

— Residential construction will continue to struggle, preventing any significant housing rebound.

— Mortgage rates will remain low, though some rise from this year’s “bargain-basement” levels is likely.

— Energy prices are expected to rise moderately, but oil prices will stay below $80 a barrel.

— State and local budgets will remain strained by slow revenue growth, the disappearance of federal stimulus funds and weakened property values.

“All in all, it’s not a bad forecast,” Conover said, “but we’re not in the land of milk and honey yet.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • GOP to Blame
    It will be even harder to get people to come here to work, hard for people to stay here and work. With a governor slashing safety nets on unemployment benefits, and an agenda to slash and eliminate funding for health care and education, it is no wonder that the state will struggle to get its employment going. And it will be mostly burgers and minimum wage jobs that will not support a single person, let alone a couple, and worse yet a family. So much for Family Values GOP

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT