IBJNews

IU embraces medical homes to cut costs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana University is turning to the medical home concept in its latest attempt to control its rising health care costs.

IU announced Friday a partnership with the Indianapolis-based IU Health hospital system, which will contract with physician offices to function as primary care clinics in Bloomington. The clinics can be visited for no extra charge by IU employees and their dependents who are enrolled in IU’s health plans.

The clinics will offer expanded hours and will take more walk-in patients than typical medical offices. IU Health also plans to use nurse care managers, who will be assigned to patients with chronic diseases in order to guide them through the maze of care they will need to treat their conditions.

Managing chronic diseases is, of course, vital to controlling costs. IU reported that 7 percent of its health beneficiaries have a chronic disease, and those patients account for 70 percent of the more than $180 million the university spends on health benefits each year.

Statewide, IU covers nearly 45,000 people, including full-time employees, retirees, graduate students and their families. The Bloomington initiative will cover 19,000 people.

But IU plans to take the clinic idea to its six other campuses, including Indianapolis, according to IU President Michael McRobbie.

IU’s clinic initiative also will establish an electronic medical records system that will allow access to patient records across the entire network of physicians and nurse care managers.

The four clinics will be in place by the end of the year. A second phase of the Bloomington initiative, launching next year, will tie in primary care physicians in nearby Bedford, Nashville and Spencer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Just because someone supports the project, they are a PR shill for the developer? Myself and everyone I know has no connection whatsoever to any developer. We just want Broad Ripple to move forward and develop, not stay stagnant.

  2. And the failure on the part of Indiana GOP to allow an expansion of Medicaid had nothing to do with Indiana hospitals' financial woes?

  3. It would have been nice if they could have arranged for at least some of Zaxby's menu to be sold at the concession stands as part of the marketing campaign.

  4. Get the feeling Browning has some PR presence on the message board this morning. I don't know a single person in the neighborhood who supports this project.

  5. Grew up in Warfleigh, which is the neighborhood directly across College from the proposed development. I am against the proposed project for several reasons: 1) Traffic Flow -- College is already a mess, especially with the new lane guidance which makes the southbound left lane 'turn only' at Broad Ripple Ave. Not to mention the backups at 64th and College. If this is in fact a Whole Foods, I would expect a steady stream of cars pulling in and out, either off College or 64th Street which are both bad already. 2) Use of TIF funds. I though TIF funds were for under-developed areas, to help bolster property tax rolls for the city. I agree with Barth that this area will do just fine letting market forces dictate what is developed. 3) Specialty Grocer Overkill. There is already a Fresh Market a mile south and a Whole Foods 2 miles north. This store is not needed. Frankly I shocked that the Whole Foods site selection criteria supports a store right here 4) Hurts the Character of the Neighborhood. This type of development, along with the (hideous) parking garage down the street are out of character with the history and fabric of this area. Broad Ripple has succeeded because it was quirky and different. It would be a shame if the city gets involved and helps support ANOTHER project that aims to turn Broad Ripple into some kind of manufactured urban center.

ADVERTISEMENT