Regulatory job prompts Mays to resign as Recorder publisher

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Former Democratic state Rep. Carolene Mays has resigned as publisher of the Indianapolis Recorder after being appointed to the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.

Mays, who has been at the newspaper since 1998, made the announcement on Tuesday. Her last day will be Friday.

Mays was named to the IURC post on Feb. 17 by Gov. Mitch Daniels to fill the vacancy left by Jeffrey Golc, whose term expired Dec. 31.

“I’ve thoroughly enjoyed working at the Recorder and turning the paper around financially, editorially and graphically,” Mays said in a written statement. “It’s been a true testament of love and endurance.”

Mays’ uncle, Bill Mays, will become publisher of the 115-year-old African-American publication. He bought the newspaper in 1990 and also owns Indianapolis-based Mays Chemical Co., one of the state's largest minority-owned businesses.

Carolene Mays served in the Indiana House from 2002 until 2008, when she unsuccessfully sought the Democratic nomination for the 7th congressional district seat now held by Rep. Andre Carson.

The five-member commission's responsibilities include overseeing the state's electric, natural gas and telephone utilities. State law allows no more than three of its members to be of the same political party.


  • re
    Well, she and Daniels allegedly have insider trading in common. Wonder if both of them also traded in Brightpoint and Cellstar/CLST Holdings. Someone should look into that asap.
  • Mays
    There's a political payback if I've ever seen one. Not to mention that she knows absolutely nothing about the buinsess of the IURC.

    Perhaps we had to find a way to balance the color in appointed positions. Other than that, she will contribute nothing other than putting cheeks in the seats. This kind of stuff is why we get in so much trouble due to the actions of politicians.

    This was not the way to go, Mitch.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing