J.D. Byrider sold to private equity firm

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel-based J.D. Byrider, the largest used-car franchisor in the nation, has been acquired by a San Francisco-area private-equity firm, the company announced Tuesday afternoon.

Terms of the deal with Altamont Capital Partners were not disclosed.

J.D. Byrider, incorporated as Byrider Franchising Inc., consists of 127 franchised and company-owned dealerships in 27 states. The company has annual corporate revenue of about $175 million and systemwide sales of $740 million. It has 562 corporate employees, including 313 in Indiana.

Byrider's sales have remained flat during the economic downturn, and Altamont’s purchase gives Byrider access to the cash it needs to grow, said Steven E. Wedding, who has been named CEO as part of the deal.

Wedding, former president of franchising, replaces James. F. DeVoe Jr. as company leader. DeVoe will remain involved as a board director and as a consultant. The company's headquarters will remain in Carmel, Wedding said.

DeVoe became CEO in 2006 after his father, James F. DeVoe, who founded the company in 1989, died at the age of 62 in a small-plane crash in Melbourne, Fla.

The senior DeVoe’s death had no influence on the decision to sell the company, Wedding said.

“We needed that capital; that was the missing ingredient,” he said. “It was not a result of Jim DeVoe’s passing.”

Plans call for Byrider this year to open two company-owned dealerships and 17 franchised locations, giving the company a total of 146 stores, 131 of which would be franchise-operated.

The dealership typically sells cars by charging higher-than-average interest rates on loans to compensate for riskier clientele. The number of consumers struggling with damaged credit continues to climb the longer the economy falters, presenting additional opportunities for Byrider, Chief Financial Officer Bill Brunner said.

“We believe this is an optimal time [to grow], because there are increasingly more customers who are in this phase of challenged credit,” Brunner said. “Therefore, we feel the prudent way to go is to grow at a moderate pace.”

Byrider has three dealerships in the Indianapolis area—on West 38th Street, North Shadeland Avenue and on U.S. 31 South in Greenwood. Overall, it has 13 locations in Indiana.  

Byrider began exploring an acquisition in 2008. Plans became serious about 18 months ago.

Altamont quickly separated itself from other potential bidders, Wedding said.

“When we went out to look for partners, we were looking for a partner who absolutely understood our model,” Wedding said. “And that’s what Altamont is about, investing in management and companies, not come in and try to re-engineer it into another direction.”

Andrea L. DeVoe, who has chaired the company since her husband’s death, said she supports the sale of the company.

“We are pleased to be putting the company in the hands of an outstanding management team and new owners who will expand on Jim’s original vision for Byrider and provide career-advancement opportunities for our employees,” she said in a written statement.

Altamont is private-equity firm founded last year by industry veterans from Golden Gate Capital that plans to concentrate on acquisitions between $10 million and $75 million. The Palo Alto-based firm closed its first fund in January with $500 million in capital.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.