IBJNews

Judge denies airport's objection to competing parking lot

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Marion County judge has denied a legal challenge by the Indianapolis Airport Authority that would prevent a Cincinnati-based developer from opening a competing parking lot near the airport.

Marion Superior Court Judge Michael Keele last week upheld a Feb. 15 decision by the Metropolitan Development Commission, which gave Chavez Properties approval to build a 2,000-space “Fast Park & Relax” lot at 8550 Stansted Road on a 31-acre site in the Ameriplex development on the city’s west side.

Chavez said the $15 million project will create 45 jobs and it would “soon” begin construction on the development.

The airport has until the end of the month to appeal Keefe’s decision.  

The airport authority filed a complaint to stop the development in March after the MDC voted 6-2 in favor of the project after an emotional three-hour hearing.

Airport officials say they are fearful the project could hurt their parking operation, and they argued a parking lot was not the best use of the land.

The project also had been opposed by nearby Plainfield-based Indy Park Ride & Fly,  the city of Indianapolis and some surrounding residents. It was backed by developers of Ameriplex and other tenants in the business park.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Airport concern about parking operator
    The Airport seems to be paranoid regarding the impact of the proposed Fast Park operation in Ameriplex, which has been influenced by the competitor of Fast Park and is now represented by the same attorney used by Park Ride and Fly. Consumer preference for parking off site or at the airport will not be substantially change by having 2,000 or 10,000 parking spaces available. There is a finite market for offsite airport parking. The Park Ride and Fly operation located in Hendricks County has capacity of about 1,800 cars. It was my understanding that Park Ride and Fly runs at about 75 to 80% capacity. If there was more demand, Park Ride and Fly would be closer to 100% and looking to expand. The U.S. takes pride in having a capitalistic free market where companies compete for business, which usually benefits the consumer and rewards the better run companies. Don’t quash our competitive free market, let consumers decide and may the best company prevail. The airport has competitive parking prices and there is no justification for being paranoid in loosing substantial parking revenue.
  • Parking Lot in Ameriplex
    It seemed that the majority of residents viewed a parking lot operation off Ameriplex with a 10' +/-covered garage port as being preferable to a 40' high warehouse building, which would also have a some 250 plus semi-trucks vs cars. Ameriplex completed a traffic study that showed traffic would be significantly below capacity of Ameriplex. There probably would not be business justification two parking lot operations long term as competition will force one of the operators out. Also as a reminder, the Ameriplex parking lot operation would generate some $500,000 in tax revenue for Marion County.
  • Disagree
    As a member of the Decatur Township Civic Council and a resident of the area, I disagree. This is an inappropriate use of the land at this particular location and I do not believe the two offsite parking operations can both survive. We do not need another large PARKING LOT that will slow down the traffic flow along this corridor.
    • Some corrections to note
      The lawsuit challenged the decision by the MDC, not the IAA. The petition before the MDC was supported by the Ameriplex developers and tenants of the industrial park, yes. But widespread support was also evident in the support of the Decatur Township Civic Council, most residents of the abutting neighborhood, and Decatur residents from all over the township who packed the hearing room. This development may not be large by other Township's standards, but Decatur suffers from the location of the airport TIF district that consumes almost all of the Ameriplex Industrial Park. This project is located outside of the TIF and will help build a balanced tax base. In addition, the project is expected to act as a catalyst to spur more commercial development. We have little commercial and great need for a foothold in that arena.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

      2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

      3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

      4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

      5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

      ADVERTISEMENT