IBJNews

Key business issues clear mid-session hurdle

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two key issues for business groupsdelaying a hike in unemployment insurance taxes and reforming local governmentcleared major hurdles this week in the Indiana General Assembly.

The first half of a short session will close Wednesday, meaning bills must have passed out of either the House or Senate to stay alive. Legislation regarding unemployment taxes and township-government reform easily met that deadline.

The Senate passed a bill that would delay for one year a planned 70-percent increase in the amount of unemployment taxes paid by employers. The bulk of the burden, an estimated $400 million, was expected to fall to manufacturers and the construction industry.

“This is our main event for this sessionby far,” said Pat Kiely, president of the Indiana Manufacturers Association.

Kiely is now focused on the Democrat-controlled House, which does not have its own version of the unemployment taxes bill. “It’s really in their hands,” he said. “So far they’ve been working with us. Conversations are cordial.”

The Indiana Chamber of Commerce joined the effort to delay the unemployment tax hike, while also pushing to eliminate township governments and trying in vain to stop a National Rifle Association initiative.

Chamber President Kevin Brinegar was glad to see that township government reform will be a live issue when the General Assembly reconvenes next week. “It’s not exactly in the shape we want it in, but we’re pleased,” he said.

The House bill would have voters in each township decide by referendum whether to keep that form of government.

The Senate bill would eliminate townships’ boards of trustees and hand budgetary oversight to county councils. The Chamber is asking members to voice their support of the Senate version.

Despite disapproval from the Chamber of Commerce and the Manufacturers Association, both the House and Senate passed bills that prevent most employers from banning their employees from keeping firearms in their vehicles while parked on company property.

“The Second Amendment protects you from your government, not your employerthat’s what we tried to argue,” Kiely said.

Representatives from Eli Lilly and Co. and Cummins Inc. showed up at the Statehouse to testify against the bill, Kiely said.

Stakes were high this session for those who make a living on food, drink and gambling.

Indiana-based alcohol distributors hoped lawmakers would shore up their defense against Southern Wine & Spirits. The Miami-based wholesaler is trying to enter the market and has challenged an Indiana law that requires alcohol distributors to have their headquarters in the state. Senate Bill 244 reiterated that post-Prohibition era residency requirement, but it failed to get a vote on Tuesday.

Lawmakers will continue to grapple with the future of the state’s casinos when they return next week.

Gambling is a $2.7 billion industry and the state’s third-largest source of tax revenue, but it could soon face competition from Ohio and Kentucky. Currently, casino gambling is confined to boats on Lake Michigan, the Ohio River and an artificial moat in French Lick. Central Indiana has two racetracks with electronic games, but no cards or dice.

Late Tuesday evening, the Senate passed a bill that many members felt would make the existing industry more competitive but not expand its physical presence.  The bill contains no provision for land-based casinos, which would have paved the way for a new casino in northwest Indiana, and possibly one near Fort Wayne.

The bill that will move to the House tweaks the law in several areas. It allows riverboats to remove their navigation equipment and the “racinos” to handle Internet-based betting on horse races. All types of facilities could add card tournaments, serve free drinks and expand their marketing.

The bill also lowers the admission tax at French Lick from $4 to $3 per person and requires entities participating in local revenue sharing to demonstrate that they serve a public purpose.

Land-based casinos might get a second chance in the House, but Ed Feigenbaum, publisher of Indiana Gaming Insight, cautioned that the issue won’t be resolved easily.

The move to land would open new areas of the state to casino gambling, while pulling traffic away from others, he said. “There’s going to be a lot of alliances formed between companies and communities.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

  2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

  3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

  4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

  5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.

ADVERTISEMENT