IBJNews

Kite reports first-quarter loss on lower revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Kite Realty Group Trust’s loss of $1.1 million in the first quarter reflected lower construction activity and lower profit on land and outlet sales, the Indianapolis-based commercial real estate developer said Wednesday.

Kite’s loss compares with a profit of $700,000 in the year-ago period and earnings of $600,000 for the fourth quarter of 2009.

Funds from operations in the first quarter fell to $7.1 million, or 10 cents per share, compared with $8.3 million, or 20 cents per share, for the year-ago period. Funds from operations, or FFO, is a common performance figure used by real estate investment trusts to define cash flow from their operations.

The company’s performance nearly met the expectations of analysts, who estimated earnings at 11 cents per share.

First-quarter revenue declined nearly 18 percent, to $25.6 million.

“We posted another strong quarter of leasing activity, and operating results in the quarter met our expectations,” Chairman and CEO John A. Kite said in a prepared statement. “The leasing environment continues to improve, and we are diligently working to capitalize on opportunities.”

Occupancy in Kite's 51 retail centers was 90 percent, unchanged from the previous quarter.

Kite signed or renewed 23 leases in the first quarter totaling 345,600 square feet. The amount included 237,500 square feet from a renewal with Macy’s at Glendale Town Center in Indianapolis.

Rental rates for the 11 lease renewals were 0.3 percent below previous rents.
    
Company shares closed Wednesday at $4.91 each, after reaching $5.97 in late April.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, let me say that I love the idea of communities being self-sufficient and people in the community not needing cars, living, working and shopping all in their neighborhood. To sum it up; I love good urban planning and hate urban sprawl. However, there are two reasons that I am against this development. First, this building doesn't fit. Density can occur in Ripple by building up top the street and better use of land. The scale of this project should be downtown. Secondly, I would be willing to bet that if a whole foods in Ripple is built, the Nora store would be closed. Here's my reasoning. The Nora Whole Foods expansion plans have been put on hold. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the Ripple proposal. Communities next to each other should work together to end sprawl and not work against each other and take other neighbors assets. Develop something both communities can be proud of and will attract more development and density. There's my soap box for the day.

  2. My apologies, Lou - it was the Indy Star that printed cost for entertaining "celebrities" during Indy 500. Sorry for confusing the always timely IBJ with Indy's Gannett reprint news source.

  3. That's fine if you want a grocery store that has festivals and live music. I guess with the prices they charge, they can afford to host such activities. As for me, I choose to spend my money more wisely and if I want to go to a festival or a concert, I will pay for that separately - not through my grocery bill.

  4. TIF is not just to attract development but to attract a higher use for that development. Carmel wisely is using TIF for numerous public parking garages. Asphalt seas of parking pay little taxes and bring even less value to a commercial area. Also density is what is going to save Indy and Broad Ripple. The days of trying to compete with burbs are long gone.

  5. The Prestige was an awesome movie.

ADVERTISEMENT