IBJNews

Landmark water tower could be razed in Greenwood

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A central Indiana water tower that once served as a local landmark for residents giving directions to wedding receptions and golf outings is being targeted for demolition because officials say it poses a safety hazard to a nearby airport.

The tower has stood near a small lake on the Valle Vista golf course in Greenwood since the 1970s. But it's no longer being used, and officials say development has obscured the view and that pilots aren't comfortable with its proximity to the Greenwood Airport about a mile away.

"It's like Monument Circle where it was once the tallest structure in Indianapolis, but it's lost in the background today," Valle Vista President and CEO Chuck Kern said. "I remember when driving on the interstate to Greenwood the first time, that it was breathtaking to see it on the hill over the farm fields. But it's just not as visible anymore."

Airport manager Ralph Hill told the Daily Journal in Franklin that planes taking off to the south fly a few hundred feet over the tower. That can pose a safety issue if a plane experiences mechanical problems and needs more room to gain altitude, he said.

He said pilots also come down out of the clouds directly into the path of the tower on overcast days and can be startled by the looming tower when they're focused on a safe landing.

Hill said he worries pilots will go to other airports where there aren't obstructions and thinks making pilots as comfortable as possible will help increase airport traffic.

Indiana American Water spokesman Joe Loughmiller said the tower serves as a backup to a newer tower built east of Interstate 65. He said it isn't being used now but would be filled if the other tower had to be drained for maintenance reasons or in case of a leak.

He said the company plans to use the tower again as Greenwood's population increases but could demolish it and build a new, more modern tower instead.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Really?
    I agree with Chris. It's just now a problem for pilots? And what about the current mayor's proposal to move the airport? Or that Johnson County allows a Walmart gas station near the runway but Marion County just across the road doesn't allow Kroger one? Perhaps we should be looking at the big picture.
  • its only money
    sure tear it down, why not the water company pays for it with adjusted rate hikes to the consumer. What was the argument 40 years ago when it was built in reference to the airport? ALso will a new tower not be as tall if your going to build another one?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT