IBJNews

Lawmaker wants review of specialty plate proceeds

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

More oversight of Indiana's specialty license plates is needed to ensure that the groups who benefit spend the money appropriately, the chairman of a legislative panel reviewing the plates said.

The plates imply a state endorsement of those groups, state Rep. Ed. Soliday, R-Valparaiso, told The Times of Munster for a story Sunday.

Soliday, chairman of the House Transportation Committee, is leading a panel of state lawmakers reviewing whether Indiana should keep, reduce or eliminate its group license plate program and looking at who should decide whether a group gets a plate.

Until this year, the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles typically issued a specialty license plate once 500 motorists had pledged to buy it. Indiana has issued some 459,000 "group" license plates in more than 85 different designs supporting universities, community organizations and other causes.

However, after the BMV in January issued a plate for Indiana Youth Group, an Indianapolis-based gay rights organization, the Republican-controlled General Assembly enacted a law imposing a moratorium on new plates until July 2013.

Meanwhile, several conservative lawmakers worked behind the scenes to revoke the gay group's plate on a technicality that also canceled the plate supporting Indiana 4-H, The Times reported.

Oversight legislation that Soliday sponsored earlier this year was rewritten for the moratorium. He now plans to sponsor a bill when the General Assembly reconvenes in January that outlines the best process for issuing specialty plates and ensuring appropriate spending.

"My issues have nothing to do with what people want to do in their own bedroom," Soliday said.

Most of the specialty plates cost an extra $40, with $25 going to the cause. Leaders of several of those groups told the study committee this month that any effort to limit or terminate the specialty plate program would hurt their budgets because license plate sales are an essential component of their fundraising programs.

Some lawmakers believe the General Assembly, not the BMV, should decide which causes get specialty.

However, state Sen. Earline Rogers, D-Gary, said putting the Legislature in charge will all but ensure partisan politics determines whether a group license plate is issued.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Gay Rights Organization? More like "Teen Life Saving Organization."
    I have to second what has already been said. To characterize IYG as a "gay rights organization" shows a serious lack of understanding. I would expect to read this in a religious conservative organization's press release, but not in your usually balanced reporting. IYG provides a safe place for GLBT youth. In our society where many people are determined to make life as uncomfortable as possible for gay people no matter their age, IYG is perhaps better described as a "Life Saving Organization for Teens."
  • Let the people decide
    As the article states, it takes 500 signatures to even get approval to apply for the license. Once available, if people choose to purchase a plate and show their support, then why should the legislature get involved? I agree with Sen. Rogers that it would become a partisan practice, and that personal beliefs would interfere in the approval process. If Soliday is indeed anti-gay, then will he pursue getting the Boy Scouts plate revoked? According to an article in the Indianapolis Star this morning ( http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012209170316 ), the organization shielded known child molesters for nearly a century. Reprehensible! [Of course I don't want to see Boy Scouts lose any funding because as a whole they are a fine organization, but you see where I'm going here...]
  • the facts
    Indiana Youth Group is not a "Gay Rights" group. Indiana Youth Group is a support group for youths, that can be gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender or even straight youths are welcome. It is a place where youths can be their selves and get the support that they need and might not be able to find else where. It's disgusting that some in the legislator are trying to discriminate against this group.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT