IBJNews

UPDATE: Extra tax dollars aimed at full-day kindergarten

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A projected increase in revenues will allow the state to provide funding for all Indiana school districts to offer full-day kindergarten.

Gov. Mitch Daniels and Republican leaders of the House and Senate announced Friday they’ll set aside $150 million for K-12 education spending, the only spending increases in the biennial budget that must be approved by the state legislature this session.

The lion’s share of that amount–roughly $100 million–would go toward the general funding provided for K-12 schools, helping to restore money cut previously. About a quarter of the $150 million will go toward full-day kindergarten, and a smaller fund–estimated between $5 million and $10 million–will help fund merit-pay raises for teachers.

A bill that has passed the Senate and is in the House would allow districts to craft plans for providing teachers raises based on their performance, rather than seniority. Daniels estimates the money set aside for raises could affect pay for thousands of teachers in the state, depending on how districts structure the criteria and how many teachers qualify.

The new education funding complements a push by Daniels and other lawmakers for broad-based education reform in the legislature, which includes increasing the number of authorizers for charter schools and providing vouchers for low-income students to attend private schools.

The governor has long endorsed full-day kindergarten and said many others agree with him. About a quarter of the state’s 5-year-olds reside in districts that don’t provide the option.

“I think it has broad support across the education spectrum,” Daniels said.

The additional $150 million is part of projected improvements in the state’s revenue forecast to be announced Friday. It’s uncertain how much of those projections will come to fruition, but Daniels said the state is confident enough in the $150 million to allow districts to plan for the additional funding this fall.

But some state lawmakers said that money just makes a dent in restoring about $300 million in cuts Daniels has made in K-12 spending over the last two years.  

“He’s restoring one out of three dollars that he cut,” said House Minority Leader Pat Bauer, D-South Bend. “That doesn’t rehire the teachers who were laid off around the state.”

Bauer and others also have raised concerns that other education reforms, including charters and private-school vouchers, would take resources from traditional public schools without moving enough students to make a meaningful dent in their operating expenses.

The notion of merit pay also has been controversial, with some raising questions about how teachers would be evaluated and whether the process would be too subjective.

But it’s supported by many proponents of reform, including U.S. Department of Education Secretary Arne Duncan. He will be in Indianapolis Friday to visit a charter school with Daniels and field questions about education reform.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

ADVERTISEMENT