IBJNews

Lawmakers getting closer on nursing home moratorium

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State lawmakers are close to approving a measure that would place a moratorium on the construction of new nursing homes except in certain cases.

Lawmakers from the Indiana House and Senate met Tuesday to hash out concerns.

Supporters of the moratorium say too many nursing homes have been built in Indiana in recent years, bringing average occupancy down to 70 percent. They say a pause is needed to ensure Medicaid recipients continue to get satisfactory care.

House Public Health Chairman Ed Clere said Tuesday that negotiators had found a compromise that would ban new construction for two years except in counties whose nursing homes are at 90-percent capacity or higher.

The fight has set owners of existing homes against developers who have been expanding rapidly in anticipation of retiring Baby Boomers.

Opponents of the measure, including a broad coalition of unions and developers, have said a moratorium would cost the state jobs and violates free market principles. But supporters say limiting the number of nursing homes could ensure Medicaid patients, who often have lower reimbursement rates than Medicare patients, are spread among existing nursing homes and get adequate treatment.

"Most states either have a moratorium or a certificate of need process," said House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis. "While we like to talk about a free market — and I'm a chief proponent of free market principles — this is really a controlled market. It's controlled by the government. Some 83 percent of funds received by the nursing home industry come from government. We say what they can charge. We say how many staff they have to have on hand."

The House passed the measure 55-40 on March 3 and sent it to a conference committee for final negotiations. That version called for a moratorium through June 30, 2015.

Negotiations throughout the session scaled the program back from a five-year ban to only one year and finally to two years. Nursing homes in development as of June 30 would be exempt from the moratorium.

Whether the abbreviated ban will have a great impact on the growth of nursing homes is unclear. A Legislative Services Agency report shows that might not be enough time to see a decrease in requests to build new homes, and developers might speed through more applications than usual to beat the June deadline this year.

The proposal also aims to tackle other issues of care for the elderly or disabled, including creating a pilot program requiring an Area Agency on Aging to supervise and advocate for patient health.

"It's very difficult to manage these type of services on your own when you have complex medical needs," Family and Social Services Administration Secretary Debra Minott said.

The most recent proposal also would allow a state oversight agency to audit and penalize AAAs for violating the new requirements, adding teeth to the legislation.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Restraint of trade
    wondering of some politician has an interest or a family member owns or has an interest in a home. This is pure $%^& to tell me I can't build. Wondering also if the business tax reduction will help the bottom line if these entities.
  • LOL
    What MORONS we have in our Statehouse that dictating the FREE MARKET is a priority! 75% of our elected representatives have NO BUSINESS being in politics.... sad.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT