IBJNews

Lawmakers seek stage-safety rules that small events can handle

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lawmakers pondering new rules for the type of temporary outdoor stage rigging involved in the 2011 deadly Indiana State Fair stage collapse said Thursday they want to make sure the state doesn't overburden smaller events.

A legislative committee met at the Statehouse to review emergency rules the state imposed earlier this year, along with international guidelines that may become a model for national regulation. The committee will recommend permanent rules to the General Assembly.

"We want assurances every county fair isn't going to be treated like the Super Bowl," Democratic Rep. Bill Davis of Portland told State Fire Marshal Jim Greeson, who was reporting to the panel on the progress of the emergency rules. Greeson's office enforces the emergency rules, which the Fire and Building Safety Commission adopted in May under orders from the Legislature.

Indiana has few events on the scale of the state fair or big-name concerts that might use the larger stages that require such tight regulation, Davis said. "I just want some kind of assurance that we're not going to try to regulate Lucas Oil stadium in Jay County or Dubois County or wherever," he said.

Greeson said the state wouldn't require temporary stages to comply with all the regulations as long as they met size and weight limits and no more than 12 people were on them at a time. "That would cover most small venues," he said. Stages set up on the back of haywagons, pickup trucks or similar vehicles are also exempt if they don't exceed certain limits, he said.

Event organizers also would be exempt if they create a buffer zone keeping people out of an area around their stages that extends 8 feet beyond the height of the rigging to protect fans in case of a collapse. That exemption would apply only to temporary outdoor stage equipment that does not extend higher than 20 feet above the stage surface.

"We don't want to overburden. We don't want to overregulate. But we all want the event to be done safely," Greeson said.

Randy Brown, general manager of Fort Wayne's Memorial Coliseum, said he heard discussion of temporary stage safety all over the world when he traveled last year as chairman of the International Association of Venue Managers.

"We're not at the final step in this process," Brown said. "We need to have a set of criteria that can be translated across all 50 states."

A group of entertainment industry leaders is studying an event safety guide, commonly called "The Purple Guide," that's been in place in the United Kingdom for about 20 years to determine if it could serve as the basis for a U.S. plan.

Tim Roberts, the director and safety adviser for Event Safety Shop Ltd., in Bristol, said the guide wasn't geared only to "the U2s and the Rolling Stones," but smaller events as well.

"It's flexible. It's adaptable," he said.

The August 2011 state fair accident killed seven people and injured nearly 60 others before a scheduled Sugarland concert. Two investigative reports found that the stage rigging that collapsed in high winds did not meet industry safety standards and that fair officials lacked a fully developed emergency plan.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Yep
    1. Eliminate all regulations. 2. Outlaw the stagehands union. 3. Exempt promoters from liability. 4. Allow the market to work. 5. That is all.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT