IBJNews

Lawsuit targets Simon's leasing tactics

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One of Indiana’s largest privately held developers is suing Simon Property Group Inc., alleging the nation’s largest mall owner abused its “market power” to bully two national retailers into backing out of leases at a lifestyle mall near Mishawaka.

An entity tied to South Bend-based Holladay Properties Inc. alleges in court filings in St. Joseph County that Simon used “anti-competitive tactics” to pry Ann Taylor Loft and Lane Bryant, committed tenants of its Heritage Square lifestyle mall, to open stores in the nearby Simon-owned University Park Mall instead.

Holladay says Simon also tried unsuccessfully to persuade Coldwater Creek and Eddie Bauer to back out of lease deals at the 230,000-square-foot Heritage Square, which broke ground in 2006.

In the case of Eddie Bauer, Holladay claims Simon CEO David Simon personally appealed to the retailer’s CEO to break the Heritage Square deal and open in Simon’s answer to the new Holladay-owned mall: a 100,000-square-foot lifestyle component added in 2008 to University Park Mall.

Simon for years has leveraged its vast power with national retailers to thwart efforts by competitors to open viable shopping centers, claims Holladay, which has developed $2 billion worth of real estate in 15 states, including AmeriPlex-branded business parks in Indianapolis, South Bend, Merrillville and Portage.

“One former Simon employee reported that there was a big meeting of various Simon executives concerning Mishawaka in which they discussed their intent to kill the Heritage Square deal,” Holladay attorneys allege in the lawsuit, filed April 22. “This former Simon employee also indicated that Simon’s tactics regarding Mishawaka is like what happens all over the country.”

Simon Property Group says in court filings that its actions in Mishawaka were nothing more than “the intense cajoling, negotiating, and horse-trading one would expect when landlords compete for tenants in the highly competitive market for commercial real estate.”

The company, which declined to discuss the case with IBJ, has called for a judge to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds Holladay failed to allege any antitrust violation—“conduct that has no legitimate business purpose, sacrifices short-term profits, and makes sense only because it eliminates competition.”

The Simon filing says the Heritage Square mall has managed to compete “vigorously” with the Simon-owned mall, winning at least four of the most sought-after tenants for lifestyle retail centers: White House Black Market, Coldwater Creek, Eddie Bauer and Aveda.

Simon also points out that Lane Bryant had a store at the Simon-owned mall and was targeted by Holladay—which in doing so “engaged in the same conduct it says Simon engaged in.”

SimonThe Indianapolis-based company also points out that any interference with the lease agreements would have occurred more than two years ago, outside the statute of limitations for such allegations.

Women’s wear retailers Ann Taylor Loft and Lane Bryant were poised to open at Heritage Square in 2006 but later backed out and opened in University Park instead.

The Holladay entity alleges Simon used a series of tactics to lure the retailers to its center, including “refusing to renew existing leases or making renewals conditioned upon the tenant not opening stores in a competing development in another market” or “increasing rates or otherwise making the terms of renewals less favorable in retaliation if a tenant opens a store in a competing center.”

Simon’s interference made Heritage Square less attractive to other potential tenants, driving down rents and impairing the property’s value by “tens of millions of dollars,” said Henry J. Price, an attorney for Holladay and partner in Indianapolis-based Price Waicukauski & Riley LLC.

“They’re trying to get retailers—regardless of quality or location of a property—to effectively deal exclusively with Simon, in Simon properties or certainly not in properties that compete with Simon,” Price said.

The lawsuit says an appraisal when construction began in 2006 put the value of Heritage Square at $46.3 million. An updated figure was not available, Price said. Holladay still controls the mall, which is anchored by a Martin’s Super Market, and has not defaulted on any loans, he said. The company declined to provide occupancy figures for the property.

Simon has faced numerous similar lawsuits over the years as it acquired competitors and became the nation’s largest publicly traded real estate company.

A shopping center developer in Texas alleged in a 2006 case, later settled out of court, that Simon intervened to prevent a Macy’s store from taking space in a non-Simon center. A co-developer with Simon in the Forum Shops at Caesars in Las Vegas alleged that Simon reduced the value of a partner’s stake by offering retailers cheaper rent in Las Vegas in exchange for taking less desirable space elsewhere.

The Federal Trade Commission is looking into possible antitrust issues relating to Simon’s pending purchase of 22 Prime Outlets malls. Some of the malls’ tenants are concerned the $2.3 billion deal, announced in December, would give Simon too much power over retailers.

Anti-competitive concerns also helped prevent Simon from succeeding in a $10 billion bid earlier this year to take over its chief U.S. rival, the debt-laden Chicago-based General Growth Properties.

Competing bidders, including Canadian real estate giant Brookfield Asset Management Inc., argued that combining the nation’s top two mall owners would stifle competition among retail landlords and attract attention from federal authorities.

“At a minimum, regulators would likely conduct a full-scale investigation into the threat to competition posed by Simon’s proposal, delaying the transaction for months,” a Brookfield official wrote in an April letter to the General Growth board.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Simon Lease Terms
    Can anyone comment on "plant charges" buried in the Simon leases, please? These fees are usury utility fees as far as I can tell, and I'm wondering how they're legal. They can add $1,000 or more to monthly rent and NNNs.
  • Snobs
    I lease space with Simon in Florida. They are the most arrogant snobs I have ever had the displeasure of associating with.
  • simon does
    What Holladay is claiming does happen plain and simple. It happened here.
  • Amatuers
    Holladay is a fine Company with expertise in industrial property development. Unfortunately they chose to enter a segment of the real estate world (lifestyle shopping centers) that they know nothing about. Trying to lease a high-end lifestyle center around a grocery store anchor is laughable at best. I have first hand knowledge of this project and have provided advisory services for several interested parties. The issue is not aggressive leasing tactics. The issue is the failure of an ill-conceived, poorly configured, poorly merchandised project by good people who just didn't know what they were doing. Don't blame Simon becuase you wanted to impress your friends in Mishawaka with a big-city like "lifestyle center" Holladay Properties, any more than you blame Macy's for ending up with 2 stores in the same mall via acquisitions and making a wise business decision to sell the one they didn't need to the mall's owner. This opened the door for a lifestyle component at University Park that was the final blow to Heritage Square. Development is not for the faint hearted or uninformed even in the best of times. The only lessons from this story/lawsuit are (1)Stick to what you know or get the help you need to diversify into other arenas and (2) There are just too many lawyers around willing to take fees from ignorant and angry clients.
  • It's just business
    Let me make sure I understand this correctly. It is okay for Holiday Properties to go after a tenant that was already in a Simon mall but it isn't okay for Simon to use the leverage it has when negotiating leases with other tenants?? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If Holiday Properties can't run with the big dogs, they need to stay on the porch.
  • must be an employee
    I doubt "Is this America", is David Simon... probably just a faithful employee.. who else would take that position and be so steadfast against the concept of Simon's heavy hand tactics. Guess everyone is entitled to an opinion... Mine is Lets keep going after big corporation corruption and bad business tactics.
  • TAXPAYERS HELP NEEDED
    I wonder how much this event is going to cost the taxpayer, we will be forced to Chip In Some Funds for the Simom Family, they are Royalty!
  • It's Not Just a Simon World
    Brokers and tenants have been talking for many years about Simon's heavy handed tactics. They have never hurt me on a deal, but cheers to Holladay for standing up to Simon and fighting back. Someone needs to.
  • This is America
    This is America..where someone can stand up and defend themselves when the 100 pound gorilla plays dirty and uses its muscle to unfairly leverage against the little guy. Its the "American" justice system baby!!

    Competition IS healthy,... when the playing field is even.... From what i hear, Simon was asleep at the wheel, and didn't like it that a competitor unexpectedly snuck into "their" turf and they retaliated with threats and flexed their muscles.

    I hope they get what they deserve.
  • really??
    wow...you must not be in the business world. competition is one thing, but acting like walmart and attempting to swallow everything in sight is another. i hope simon loses this case, maybe it will start a trends in other markets.
  • David Simon, is that you?
    As busy as David Simon should be taking over the real estate world, you wouldn't think he had time to defend himself on here.
  • Competition is good
    Sounds like we are hearing from some sore losers...Competition is healthy... This FTC crap against SPG is crap.

    Under Hollaloser's theory it sounds like we need to break up FedEx and UPS...

    It is all bull crap. SPG is under the same intense pressure to lease their space as any other landlord in this tight market.

    With online shopping and well represented, available and differentiated real estate SPG has no control o things... If so they would have been able to pick up GGP.

    Go get em David and file a massive countersuit against them for Defaming the SPG Brand....

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

    2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

    3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

    4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

    5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

    ADVERTISEMENT