IBJNews

Lawsuit targets Simon's leasing tactics

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One of Indiana’s largest privately held developers is suing Simon Property Group Inc., alleging the nation’s largest mall owner abused its “market power” to bully two national retailers into backing out of leases at a lifestyle mall near Mishawaka.

An entity tied to South Bend-based Holladay Properties Inc. alleges in court filings in St. Joseph County that Simon used “anti-competitive tactics” to pry Ann Taylor Loft and Lane Bryant, committed tenants of its Heritage Square lifestyle mall, to open stores in the nearby Simon-owned University Park Mall instead.

Holladay says Simon also tried unsuccessfully to persuade Coldwater Creek and Eddie Bauer to back out of lease deals at the 230,000-square-foot Heritage Square, which broke ground in 2006.

In the case of Eddie Bauer, Holladay claims Simon CEO David Simon personally appealed to the retailer’s CEO to break the Heritage Square deal and open in Simon’s answer to the new Holladay-owned mall: a 100,000-square-foot lifestyle component added in 2008 to University Park Mall.

Simon for years has leveraged its vast power with national retailers to thwart efforts by competitors to open viable shopping centers, claims Holladay, which has developed $2 billion worth of real estate in 15 states, including AmeriPlex-branded business parks in Indianapolis, South Bend, Merrillville and Portage.

“One former Simon employee reported that there was a big meeting of various Simon executives concerning Mishawaka in which they discussed their intent to kill the Heritage Square deal,” Holladay attorneys allege in the lawsuit, filed April 22. “This former Simon employee also indicated that Simon’s tactics regarding Mishawaka is like what happens all over the country.”

Simon Property Group says in court filings that its actions in Mishawaka were nothing more than “the intense cajoling, negotiating, and horse-trading one would expect when landlords compete for tenants in the highly competitive market for commercial real estate.”

The company, which declined to discuss the case with IBJ, has called for a judge to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds Holladay failed to allege any antitrust violation—“conduct that has no legitimate business purpose, sacrifices short-term profits, and makes sense only because it eliminates competition.”

The Simon filing says the Heritage Square mall has managed to compete “vigorously” with the Simon-owned mall, winning at least four of the most sought-after tenants for lifestyle retail centers: White House Black Market, Coldwater Creek, Eddie Bauer and Aveda.

Simon also points out that Lane Bryant had a store at the Simon-owned mall and was targeted by Holladay—which in doing so “engaged in the same conduct it says Simon engaged in.”

SimonThe Indianapolis-based company also points out that any interference with the lease agreements would have occurred more than two years ago, outside the statute of limitations for such allegations.

Women’s wear retailers Ann Taylor Loft and Lane Bryant were poised to open at Heritage Square in 2006 but later backed out and opened in University Park instead.

The Holladay entity alleges Simon used a series of tactics to lure the retailers to its center, including “refusing to renew existing leases or making renewals conditioned upon the tenant not opening stores in a competing development in another market” or “increasing rates or otherwise making the terms of renewals less favorable in retaliation if a tenant opens a store in a competing center.”

Simon’s interference made Heritage Square less attractive to other potential tenants, driving down rents and impairing the property’s value by “tens of millions of dollars,” said Henry J. Price, an attorney for Holladay and partner in Indianapolis-based Price Waicukauski & Riley LLC.

“They’re trying to get retailers—regardless of quality or location of a property—to effectively deal exclusively with Simon, in Simon properties or certainly not in properties that compete with Simon,” Price said.

The lawsuit says an appraisal when construction began in 2006 put the value of Heritage Square at $46.3 million. An updated figure was not available, Price said. Holladay still controls the mall, which is anchored by a Martin’s Super Market, and has not defaulted on any loans, he said. The company declined to provide occupancy figures for the property.

Simon has faced numerous similar lawsuits over the years as it acquired competitors and became the nation’s largest publicly traded real estate company.

A shopping center developer in Texas alleged in a 2006 case, later settled out of court, that Simon intervened to prevent a Macy’s store from taking space in a non-Simon center. A co-developer with Simon in the Forum Shops at Caesars in Las Vegas alleged that Simon reduced the value of a partner’s stake by offering retailers cheaper rent in Las Vegas in exchange for taking less desirable space elsewhere.

The Federal Trade Commission is looking into possible antitrust issues relating to Simon’s pending purchase of 22 Prime Outlets malls. Some of the malls’ tenants are concerned the $2.3 billion deal, announced in December, would give Simon too much power over retailers.

Anti-competitive concerns also helped prevent Simon from succeeding in a $10 billion bid earlier this year to take over its chief U.S. rival, the debt-laden Chicago-based General Growth Properties.

Competing bidders, including Canadian real estate giant Brookfield Asset Management Inc., argued that combining the nation’s top two mall owners would stifle competition among retail landlords and attract attention from federal authorities.

“At a minimum, regulators would likely conduct a full-scale investigation into the threat to competition posed by Simon’s proposal, delaying the transaction for months,” a Brookfield official wrote in an April letter to the General Growth board.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Simon Lease Terms
    Can anyone comment on "plant charges" buried in the Simon leases, please? These fees are usury utility fees as far as I can tell, and I'm wondering how they're legal. They can add $1,000 or more to monthly rent and NNNs.
  • Snobs
    I lease space with Simon in Florida. They are the most arrogant snobs I have ever had the displeasure of associating with.
  • simon does
    What Holladay is claiming does happen plain and simple. It happened here.
  • Amatuers
    Holladay is a fine Company with expertise in industrial property development. Unfortunately they chose to enter a segment of the real estate world (lifestyle shopping centers) that they know nothing about. Trying to lease a high-end lifestyle center around a grocery store anchor is laughable at best. I have first hand knowledge of this project and have provided advisory services for several interested parties. The issue is not aggressive leasing tactics. The issue is the failure of an ill-conceived, poorly configured, poorly merchandised project by good people who just didn't know what they were doing. Don't blame Simon becuase you wanted to impress your friends in Mishawaka with a big-city like "lifestyle center" Holladay Properties, any more than you blame Macy's for ending up with 2 stores in the same mall via acquisitions and making a wise business decision to sell the one they didn't need to the mall's owner. This opened the door for a lifestyle component at University Park that was the final blow to Heritage Square. Development is not for the faint hearted or uninformed even in the best of times. The only lessons from this story/lawsuit are (1)Stick to what you know or get the help you need to diversify into other arenas and (2) There are just too many lawyers around willing to take fees from ignorant and angry clients.
  • It's just business
    Let me make sure I understand this correctly. It is okay for Holiday Properties to go after a tenant that was already in a Simon mall but it isn't okay for Simon to use the leverage it has when negotiating leases with other tenants?? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. If Holiday Properties can't run with the big dogs, they need to stay on the porch.
  • must be an employee
    I doubt "Is this America", is David Simon... probably just a faithful employee.. who else would take that position and be so steadfast against the concept of Simon's heavy hand tactics. Guess everyone is entitled to an opinion... Mine is Lets keep going after big corporation corruption and bad business tactics.
  • TAXPAYERS HELP NEEDED
    I wonder how much this event is going to cost the taxpayer, we will be forced to Chip In Some Funds for the Simom Family, they are Royalty!
  • It's Not Just a Simon World
    Brokers and tenants have been talking for many years about Simon's heavy handed tactics. They have never hurt me on a deal, but cheers to Holladay for standing up to Simon and fighting back. Someone needs to.
  • This is America
    This is America..where someone can stand up and defend themselves when the 100 pound gorilla plays dirty and uses its muscle to unfairly leverage against the little guy. Its the "American" justice system baby!!

    Competition IS healthy,... when the playing field is even.... From what i hear, Simon was asleep at the wheel, and didn't like it that a competitor unexpectedly snuck into "their" turf and they retaliated with threats and flexed their muscles.

    I hope they get what they deserve.
  • really??
    wow...you must not be in the business world. competition is one thing, but acting like walmart and attempting to swallow everything in sight is another. i hope simon loses this case, maybe it will start a trends in other markets.
  • David Simon, is that you?
    As busy as David Simon should be taking over the real estate world, you wouldn't think he had time to defend himself on here.
  • Competition is good
    Sounds like we are hearing from some sore losers...Competition is healthy... This FTC crap against SPG is crap.

    Under Hollaloser's theory it sounds like we need to break up FedEx and UPS...

    It is all bull crap. SPG is under the same intense pressure to lease their space as any other landlord in this tight market.

    With online shopping and well represented, available and differentiated real estate SPG has no control o things... If so they would have been able to pick up GGP.

    Go get em David and file a massive countersuit against them for Defaming the SPG Brand....

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

    2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

    3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

    4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

    5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

    ADVERTISEMENT