IBJNews

Life sciences hold up in recession

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana’s life sciences companies held up better than their peers around the country—and far better than the rest of Indiana's private sector—during the early phases of the economic downturn.

That trend came through in a report released last week by the Biotechnology Industry Organization at its annual convention in Boston.

The report showed that—from 2007, the peak of the boom times, to 2010—Indiana’s life sciences companies shed about 420 jobs overall, or about 0.7 percent. The job loss rate was twice as high among life sciences firms nationally—and more than 10 times higher among all of Indiana’s private employers.

Meanwhile, during the same three-year period, wages for Indiana’s life sciences jobs rose 3.9 percent, to an annual average of $85,100. Wages at life sciences firms nationally rose just 0.6 percent during that period, to $82,700.

Wages among all of Indiana’s private-sector businesses fell a sharp 7.9 percent from 2007 to 2010, to an annual average of $49,500.

Those data, the most recent available, were produced by Ohio-based research firm Battelle, using job and wage figures for 27 life sciences-related industry subgroups, which were reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“This again shows that the investments made over a decade ago are paying off,” said Kristin Jones, CEO of the Indiana Health Industry Forum, which is the Indiana affiliate of the Boston-based Biotechnology Industry Organization.

Interestingly, Indiana struggled most in the pharmaceutical sector during the 2007 to 2010 period. With Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. cutting more than 1,000 jobs here in 2010, employment in that sector tumbled 12.2 percent, to 17,141 workers.

The jobs that remain, however, tend to pay more than before. While pharmaceutical jobs experienced almost no increase in wages from 2001 to 2007, they surged 20 percent from 2007 to 2010, when they averaged $127,600 per worker.

Battelle’s analysis marked out states that have a specialization in each of five life sciences sectors, which include pharmaceuticals, agricultural chemicals, medical devices, research and biosciences distribution. A state was determined to have a specialization if its jobs per capita in one of those sectors was more than 20 percent higher than the national average.

No state had a specialization in all five sectors. Only Indiana, New Jersey and Puerto Rico had specializations in four out of five of the sectors. The only sector  in which Indiana lagged was research, where it has 20 percent fewer jobs per capita than the national average.

“Our industry here is both diverse and deep, and we’re now fully positioned to do even more,” David Johnson, CEO of the Indianapolis-based life sciences development group BioCrossroads, said in a prepared statement. “In fact, and especially at this time of challenge and change, it is critical that we continue to build from strength and pursue opportunities to encourage growth, innovation and support.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT