IBJNews

Lilly continues string of positive trials

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co. is continuing a string of positive yet incomplete clinical trial results with results from experimental cancer and diabetes drugs.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker said Monday its experimental diabetes drug dulaglutide lowered blood sugar in Type 2 diabetics better than three existing diabetes drugs in three Phase 3 clinical trials.

And on Oct. 15, Lilly announced that its cancer drug ramucirumab helped extend survival times for stomach cancer patients in a Phase 3 trial.

The results, when combined with the positive signs Lilly reported from its Alzheimer’s drug solanezumab, present an encouraging pattern that the company’s pipeline-driven strategy may, in fact, have a shot at succeeding. Its a stark reversal from a series of clinical trial failures that Lilly suffered this summer.

“This is great news for the pipeline, which continues the recent news on sola, ramucirumab and bariticinib,” UBS pharmaceutical analyst Marc Goodman said in a note to investors Monday. Baricitinib is another Lilly drug aimed at rheumatoid arthritis.

Investors have had similar thoughts, bidding up Lilly shares 24 percent over the past two months.

But Lilly still has a bit of proving to do. Its Alzheimer’s drug most likely will need to go through another Phase 3 clinical trial before it can win approval from regulators.

Meanwhile, the diabetes drug dulaglutide has to show that it is superior to Bydureon, a similar once-weekly injectable medicine already on the market. Both dulaglutide and Bydureon are known as glucagon-like peptides, or GLP-1 drugs. In 2005, Lilly helped launch the first GLP medicine, Byetta, in partnership with California-based Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc. The two companies also launched Bydureon, which is a once-weekly version of Byetta, last year.

Patients receiving once-weekly injections of dulaglutide saw their levels of hemoglobin A1C—a key measure of blood sugar—go down more than did patients in the trials taking metformin, Byetta or Januvia.

But how much the levels went down, Lilly isn’t saying. Lilly said it would present more data about dulaglutdie during medical conferences in 2013 and 2014. Lilly plans to file for regulatory approval of dulagrlutide next year.

In its clinical trials, Bydureon also produced lower levels of blood sugar than either Byetta or Januvia, which is a popular oral diabetes medicine made by New Jersey-based Merck & Co. Inc.

Lilly gave up rights to both Byetta and Bydureon last year after a dispute with its former partner on the drugs, California-based Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc. Lilly received a $250 million break-up fee, and royalties up to $1.2 billion over the life of Byetta.

"We're very encouraged by the results to date from our Phase III dulaglutide trials and are pleased to be one step closer to offering a new GLP-1 treatment option for Type 2 diabetes," Enrique Conterno, president of Lilly’s diabetes division, said in a prepared statement.

And as for the cancer drug ramucirumab, Lilly’s clinical trial data only showed that its drug was better than “best supportive care,” not better than another cancer drug. Lilly is still running a clinical trial that compares ramucirumab against an old cancer drug, paclitaxel.

Results from that second Phase 3 trial are expected a year from now.

“Ramu news encouraging but we need to see more data,” is how Morgan Stanley analyst David Risinger headlined his research note on the drug’s clinical trial results.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

  2. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

  3. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

  4. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

  5. David Copperfield!

ADVERTISEMENT