IBJNews

Lilly, GE announce cancer diagnostic breakthrough

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co. and General Electric Co. say they’ve made a breakthrough in cancer research that could help Lilly cut the size and cost of its clinical trials.

The two companies, based in Indianapolis and New York, respectively, said they have developed a new protein mapping technique that allows scientists to observe 25 different biomarkers produced by cancer tumors at one time.

Currently, scientists can see only one or two biomarkers in a cancer tumor.

Biomarkers are proteins made by human cells. As their levels rise or fall in a person’s body, these proteins can indicate the presence of a disease. For example, high levels of hemoglobin A1C indicate diabetes.

Lilly measures how biomarkers respond to its drugs as a shortcut to determining if the drugs are working or not.

The technology, developed over the last two years with GE, will help Lilly predict in advance which patients are most likely to benefit from an experimental drug. By screening patients with the new tool, Lilly can test a drug on fewer patients, saving time and money.

Lilly will apply the technology it developed with GE to its clinical trials in summer 2010. Lilly has 20 different cancer drugs in clinical trials, roughly a third of its entire experimental pipeline.

Lilly has been working feverishly to speed up and reduce costs on its clinical trials. As of December, the company said its average cost to bring a drug to market had fallen from $1.2 billion in 2007 to $1 billion. The company wants to have an average cost of $800 million.

It needs such savings because Lilly is trying to move 61 different drugs through clinical trials, an enormously costly undertaking.

It needs to bring new drugs to market because several of its top-selling drugs will lose patent protection from 2010-2014, which will sap more than 50 percent of Lilly’s current sales.

To date, the new technology has been tested successfully on colon and prostate cancer tissue samples. GE and Lilly scientists think it can be applied to all types of cancer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT