IBJNews

Local television ratings for Reds games soar

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Cincinnati Reds have long had a strong following in Indianapolis, but this year's run to the playoffs is boosting the Major League Baseball team's popularity to another level.

The Reds, who clinched their first playoff berth since 1995 on Tuesday night, have been scoring high on the Fox Sports Indiana cable channel. 

Year-to-date, ratings are up over last year by 60 percent, according to New York-based Nielsen Media Research. This August, ratings on Fox Sports for Reds games were up 144 percent over the same period a year ago. September ratings have been up 196 percent.

In August, 10,200 Indianapolis-area television households on average watched Reds games on Fox Sports. For Tuesday’s playoff-clinching game, 16,100 TV households tuned in to watch the Reds clip the Houston Astros 3-2.

Fox Sports will air a total of 96 Reds games in total this year.

“Indianapolis has always been a strong market for Cincinnati Reds baseball,” said Fox Sports spokesman Geoffrey Goldman. “We’ve seen a healthy increase in ratings in Indianapolis for Reds telecasts in the second half of the season as the Reds have soared.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Ratings?
    Anthony,

    Respectfully, where do you get your rating information from? Does the Nielsen Media Research Company have ratings for other Indianapolis sports such as Colts, Indians, Pacers, IRL or Indy 500?
  • Not So Much
    Not to sound mean about it, but this number is completely unimpressive. According to Nielsen, the game was the 453rd most-watched program in the Indy market yesterday. It pulled the same number as a rerun of Frasier on Lifetime, a rerun of Green Acres on WHMB, and something called Wonder Pets on Nick Jr.
  • Reds fan in Greenwood
    I've been following the Reds since '06 after a long drought of not watching baseball. This year of course has been the more exciting of those past 4 years, but it's nice to see some recognition that there are Reds fans in the Indianapolis area. I'm glad Fox Sports covers the number of games that they do. Keep the game coverage coming!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

ADVERTISEMENT