IBJNews

Local television stations reap election windfalls

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The hotly contested race between Joe Donnelly and Richard Mourdock for U.S. Senate won’t be decided until Nov. 6. But Indianapolis television stations already can declare themselves winners based on the huge amounts of campaign cash being spent to advertise on their channels.

Throw in the Indiana governor’s contest between U.S. Rep. Mike Pence and former Speaker of the Indiana House John Gregg, and the stations have reaped a collective windfall of at least $4 million from the candidates, according to Federal Communications Commission filings. And that's not counting the estimated $4.5 million that numerous Political Action Committees have spent with them to support both state and federal candidates in Indiana.

The amounts candidates are spending on television advertising are available this year for the first time online. In the past, those interested in obtaining the figures had to physically travel to each station to get copies.

The FCC doesn't require broadcasters to upload files in a single format, however, making it difficult to get a precise accounting of spending.

Still, the records provide a glimpse into just how important the seat that veteran U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar lost to Mourdock in the Republican primary is to both Republicans and Democrats. It’s one of four seats the GOP needs to take control of the Senate.

Through Monday, Donnelly and Mourdock together had shelled out about $1.8 million—roughly $900,000 each—to advertise on WRTV-TV Channel 6, WISH-TV Channel 8, WTHR-TV Channel 13 and WXIN-TV Channel 59, according to FCC filings.

“I would say it’s the most expensive Senate race in history,” said Bill Perkins, president of Indianapolis-based media-buying firm Perkins Nichols Media, who bought spots for Lugar in the primary. “The money Mourdock spent in the primary was the most ever spent, and this far exceeds that.”

Among the more lucrative spots was a 30-second ad during WTHR’s broadcast of Sunday Night Football that cost Donnelly $4,000.

The amounts the candidates are spending undoubtedly are much larger when considering spots bought on cable television stations and on local networks in metropolitan areas outside of Indianapolis.

In addition, political action committees also are forking out big bucks to help their candidate get elected, raising the stakes even more.

Donnelly and Mourdock collectively have spent about $700,000 to advertise on WTHR—the most of any local television station. But the roughly $1.2 million various PACs have paid the station underscores the importance of the race even more.

The conservative Club for Growth Action PAC has spent more than $350,000 with WTHR while the left-leaning Center Forward tallied up a bill of nearly $300,000.

A spokesman for the Washington, D.C.-based Club for Growth declined to specify how much the group has spent locally but said it has contributed $1.7 million statewide to back Mourdock.

"It's one of the races [nationally] that Club for Growth Action has invested most heavily in," spokesman Barney Keller said.

Donnelly and Mourdock also have spent big locally with WISH, totaling more than $620,000 between them.

Only one of the four general managers—Larry Blackerby at WRTV—returned phone calls seeking comment on the advertising dollars.

“Every election year brings money in,” Blackerby said. “That’s been going on for a couple of months in the battleground states. Whereas here, it’s only picked up in the last couple of days [since mid-October].”

To be sure, President Obama and challenger Mitt Romney are dumping loads of money into swing states such as Florida, Ohio and Wisconsin.

Romney is expected to carry Indiana, evidenced by the lack of attention the two are giving central Indiana. None of the four local stations in Indianapolis have reported advertising spending by either Obama or Romney, according to the FCC.

But the television broadcasters more than make up for the lack of spending by the presidential candidates with the race for Indiana governor.

Pence and Gregg have spent nearly $1.2 million each with the four local stations, with WTHR capturing about $900,000 of the $2.4 million total.

Federal law mandates that candidates are to be given the lowest rate available for a certain time spot. But it’s open season on PACs, said Perkins the media buyer.

“For a PAC spot, stations can charge anything they want,” he said, “and they will charge obscene rates.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • well said...
    we need to take the $$$ OUT of politics in order for people to have control over the elections NOT the corporate-owned media who prostitute themselves every two years to make BIG $$$ off the elections...but the corporate media does NOT want this to happen and have fought any attempts to change it by buying the politicians
  • NO MORE ADS
    STOP THE ADS - let put in place a legal ban on ads as they harmful to everyone , like smoking....... the ads are mostly lies and 98% are negative .....has our society fallen this far that we would actually let this garbage which the politicos promote influence our decision making process - I hope not _BAN ALL POLITICAL ADS ON TV OR RADIO NOW

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT