IBJNews

Lost funding puts brakes on commuter buses

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The expiration of a federal grant will halt a popular suburban commuter bus service at year’s end, but transit advocates say it may be just a temporary stoppage.

Launched a few years ago, the IndyGo Commuter Express routes from Fishers and Carmel to downtown Indianapolis get 80 percent of their funding from a Congestion Mitigation Air Quality grant that will be depleted by the end of the year. The service has annual expenses of just over $1 million.

Other funding comes from $3-per-trip fares, and ridership has been strong enough to pay the local match to the federal grant solely through those fares, without the municipalities chipping in. During the course of operation, the routes have provided about 445,000 trips.

But without additional subsidy, the cost of providing that service would be placed on riders, who would face fares of between $7 and $9.

IndyGo and the Central Indiana Regional Transit Authority are optimistic they can find other funding sources. CIRTA is looking at other grants, among them federal funding that helps pay for so-called reverse commuting in which workers leave the city for work in the suburbs, but that also would require cash-tight municipalities to contribute.

“All indications point to a likelihood that a new federal grant will be matched with local public and private dollars, and a new commuter express service will evolve in the near future,” Ehren Bingaman, executive director for CIRTA, said in a news release.

He said the group hoped to have details confirmed and would provide more information by the end of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Buses
    I work for the company that actually operates this service. While we're talking about funding, let's also include the dozen or so jobs that are directly involved with this operation - and, no, they're not $500k/yr by any stretch. What CIRTA should be doing is looking at the additional locales which could benefit from this service. I'd note that the attempt to the south wasn't as successful (Greenwood) as the Northeast Corridor. Whether Greenfield would use the service is anyone's guess, as would be Mooresville, Plainfield, Danville, Brownsburg, or Zionsville. These questions also are the ones the proposed commuter rail service has to be able to address and answer, of course.
  • I would rather....
    subsidize mass transit than "Palaces for the rich," downtown (Lucas Oil) that I will never see the inside of.
  • Sick-n-tired...
    I'm tired of my gas-tax money subsidizing the highways that Greenfield commuters use to get downtown. (I live and work in Indy and don't use the interstate.)


    And while we're at it, let's add a commuter tax so that Sick-n-tired and the other commuters pay for infrastructure and services (police, fire, ambulance, water, sewer, streets) that they use while commuting and working in Indy.

    Why in the world should my hard-earned money be used to subsidize and protect someone commuting 25 miles from Greenfield to Downtown?
  • Let it die !!!
    Consider this. In it's vast wisdom, our government has deeply discounted 445,000 rides at $3. That's 115,000 trips per year at an annual cost of about $1,000,000, or so they say. That's a total cost of $8.69 per ride. Now, keep in mind, our government taxes us first and runs it through some department where people making 6 figures... and a pension... have to manage it. Let's say it's another $2 per ride management cost. We're at $10.69 per ride on taxpayers like me. I work downtown too, but live in Greenfield. Even if the bus served my area, I would exercise my Freedom and choose to drive with all costs paid by me! In any case, the buses come nowhere near me. Why in the world should my hard earned money be used to subsidize someone else's ride to work? And you wonder what's wrong with our government. I bet if we looked hard we could find thousands of examples like this. It would be rather easy to make a huge dent in our deficit by eliminating ridiculous programs like this. Let it die!
  • Reverse commuting?
    I'm a faithful Fishers rider and I hope they keep this going somehow. Not sure how reverse commuting would work though. Eastern Star Church is smack in the middle of residential.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT