LOU'S VIEWS: Turf's up at downtown art showcase

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

The most impressive thing about “Turf,” the art installation exhibition occupying old Indianapolis City Hall/old Indiana State Museum through Feb. 5, is that it doesn’t feel like it was created by committee. There’s no sense of, “OK, you can be part of this high-profile show if you follow these rules …”

There are other big positives as well, but that overarching sense of artistic freedom demonstrates that Indianapolis has reached a certain degree of maturity when it comes to its art. A lesser town would have at least one eye focused on making sure every work showcases it in the best promotional light.

Another great thing about “Turf” is that it is both free and welcoming. That’s not to say it isn’t a show worth paying for. But the free admission makes it more likely to attract both locals making a downtown run and visitors looking for diversion during their stay.

A&E Three alphabets dangle together in Anila Quayyum Agha’s “My Forked Tongue,” one of the many highlights of the “Turf” exhibition. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Then there’s the art itself, of course.

I had the strongest initial positive reaction to Anila Quayyum Agha’s magical room of dangling letters “My Forked Tongue,” Lesley Baker’s whimsical and sweet “Bull in a China Shop” (with the bull constructed from shipping pallets), Jeff Martin’s crowd-pleasing “Switch V2.0” (which should get a permanent place at The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis), and Nick Allman’s dramatic “Coffee Table,” creating the odd tableau of an old-fashioned refrigerator that has crashed through from the floor above. And Greg Hull’s “Meditated Terrain”—consisting of a series of computer screens arranged to create a waterfall—is strengthened by its context, including dim lighting, a charming bridge, and a bed of black umbrellas. The only thing missing is a bench for some meditative time.

A&E Greg Hull’s “Meditated Terrain” turns computer screens into a dramatic waterfall. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Other works revealed more on my second visit. That’s when the lack of specific usefulness of the orange machine in John Himmelfarb’s “The Road Leaves a Trail Behind” began to resonate for me. That’s when I realized that Casey Roberts’ “Crossroads” was taking me back to this building’s Indiana State Museum days (although the dioramas back then didn’t combine wildlife and musical instruments). And that’s when the cosmic implications of Brian James Priest’s and Christopher Iseri’s “Stardust to Stardust” deepened.

Not every player on the “Turf” team is Pro-Bowl-ready. Ratio Architect’s “Design Matters” feels like a trade show display and is dramatically out of place. Mike Lyons’ “A Rapid Variation” seems like a cordoned-off area to a famed artist’s space—which would be fine if we had any reason to care about this faux studio. And Lauren Zoll’s “Perspectives on Indianapolis” comes across as the beginning of a promising project rather than a complete one.

A&E With multiple screens and an old-school video game, Artur Silva’s “Culture is a Gun” is one of the few “Turf” pieces to try to make an overt political statement. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Still, those less-than-successful pieces help make my point. A committee would have buffed away these edges, but would also have stifled the most interesting work. Even with its flaws, “Turf” is a must-see and a terrific addition to the Super Bowl-ified downtown.

Now let’s see what can be done with this landmark building the rest of the year.

Note: If it were a piece of art and not an accident, my favorite piece of art at “Turf” might be the stone eagle’s feet perched on the stone ball outside the building. Unfortunately, those feet once belonged to a complete bird, which was broken recently by an errant crane operator.•


This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.