TV stations bring more morning news to air

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WRTV-TV Channel 6 will boost its weekend-morning offerings on Saturday, when it resumes a newscast eliminated years ago by penny-pinching former owner McGraw-Hill.

The addition is among the latest moves from local TV stations to expand news programming. For example, WISH-TV Channel 8 on Monday plans to start its “Daybreak” weekday morning news a half-hour earlier, at 4:30 a.m., to cater to early risers. That will bring its morning newscasts on weekdays to 3-½ hours per day.

WXIN-TV Fox59 remains first to air on weekdays, with a block of local news beginning at 4 a.m. It started that newscast in early 2011.

But WRTV has the most to gain in potential advertising revenue when it comes to bolstering its morning news. It will be the last of the four local network TV affiliates in recent years to offer weekend morning newscasts. It’s a strategy to generate additional local advertising revenue as much as viewer eyeballs.

WRTV's “Good Morning Indiana” weekend edition will air Saturdays between 6 a.m. and 8 a.m., and then from 9.a.m. to 10 a.m. The station also will launch morning news on Sundays, from 6 a.m. to 7:30 a.m.

Moreover, the ABC affiliate will move its “Indianapolis This Week” show to 7:30 a.m. on Sundays from its current mid-morning slot. The show will also get a full-time host in the form of veteran newsman Rafael Sanchez.

“This will really give the show a solid base,” said Terri Cope-Walton, news director at WRTV.

Former owner McGraw-Hill eliminated the weekend newscast several years ago in a cost-saving move, said Paul Montgomery, director of audience development.

Cope-Walton and WRTV general manager Larry Blackerby pitched its new owner, Cincinnati-based E.W. Scripps, on making an investment to resume the weekend morning news. Last May, Scripps gave WRTV the green light to hire eight additional people to support the existing weekday morning news, as well as the upcoming weekend version of "Good Morning Indiana."

Those hires include a digital news editor for weekends. WRTV and other local stations increasingly deliver news through their online and mobile sites, as well as their traditional TV platforms.

In May and June, WRTV hired additional on-air talent, including Jade Hindmon and Kyle Mounce, who will co-anchor the weekend morning newscasts.

“Whatever revenue you get from doing a local newscast on Saturdays is more than you’re going to get from carrying the network,” said Bill Perkins, a media buyer and principal of Perkins Nichols Media.

On the other hand, he noted, the city’s other television stations already offer morning news on weekends, so “I can’t believe it’s going to be great revenue potential, at least not until you show some ratings.”

WRTV is betting the move will pay off over time, noting that resumption of weekend morning news also coincides with lifestyle changes of viewers.

“People are staying busy on the weekends," Cope-Walton said. "They still want to know the forecast. They want to plan around their events."

She said the new morning offering will be heavy on practical content such as traffic and information about events, in addition to breaking news and updates on stories reported the night before.

Since it was acquired by Scripps in 2011, WRTV also has expanded its local sports offerings on Home Town Sports & News, Channel 6.2. The channel includes events from the Indiana High School Athletic Association and local colleges, as well as broadcasts of Indianapolis Indians baseball games.

A number of its competitors offer re-runs of classic TV shows on their digital sub-channels.


  • more news?
    How about these TV stations produce one decent hour of actual local news rather than giving us multiple hours of lazy news-like material (cooking segments, repurposed national content, police reports, etc.). It's too bad that newspaper staffs are dwindling because they appear to be the only ones practicing actual journalism and not just listening to police scanners.
  • DTV Subchannels
    The article mentioned WRTV's Channel 6.2. I am an AT&T U-Verse subscriber and do not understand AT&T's reluctance to carry the subchannels. Comcast and Brighthouse do but not U-Verse. Yes i could get an antenna but the ATSC tuners are very finicky as leaf laden trees, airplanes and other such can make the "all or nothing" signal go crazy.
  • To IndyGirl
    go to Fry's or someone else who has antennaes, get an antenna, either an outside, or sometimes an inside will work. I get around 40 channels including the HD channels for 4,6,8,13,20,23,59,and 63. For Free.
    I am not a cable or dish subscriber and I rely on the TV to work when I plug it in. Since the switch to HD I no longer receive many channels. I do receive CH 6, 20, 29, 40 and sometimes, but not often 59. So, if you want my business, please get a signal boost!
  • Work job
    That seems like a great idea. Good job, WRTV!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.