Muncie-based glass maker to be sold for $1.6B

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Ardagh Group said it has agreed to buy the Indiana-based glass bottle and jar manufacturing unit of Saint-Gobain SA for $1.7 billion to increase its packaging business and expand in the United States.

The offer for Muncie-based Verallia North America is a binding and irrevocable one, Luxembourg-based Ardagh said Monday in a prepared statement. French giant Saint-Gobain is discussing the planned sale with unions ahead of a planned completion date later this year.

Verallia North America has about 4,400 employees at 13 manufacturing plants in the United States, including more than 650 workers in Indiana. The company has about 300 workers at its headquarters in Muncie and it also has a plant in Dunkirk, northeast of Muncie, where it employs more than 350.

“The acquisition of Verallia North America would be another important milestone in the evolution of Ardagh,” Chairman Paul Coulson said in a prepared statement.

Verallia will increase the size of Ardagh's glass business by 60 percent, and leave the U.S. accounting for 40 percent of its sales and earnings at a time when retail sales are on the increase. A housing-market rebound, higher stock prices and an improving job market are helping sustain consumer spending, which accounts for about 70 percent of the economy.

Verallia had sales of about $1.61 billion and an operating profit of $171 million in 2012.The company says it is the second-biggest maker of glass bottles and jars in the United States.

Ardagh plans to raise $1.45 billion in debt, denominated in both euro and dollar-denominated senior secured notes and senior notes to finance the purchase. Fourth-quarter sales increased by about 5 percent, with earnings “marginally higher,” the company said.

The acquisition is subject to regulatory approval.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.