Muncie-based glass maker to be sold for $1.6B

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Ardagh Group said it has agreed to buy the Indiana-based glass bottle and jar manufacturing unit of Saint-Gobain SA for $1.7 billion to increase its packaging business and expand in the United States.

The offer for Muncie-based Verallia North America is a binding and irrevocable one, Luxembourg-based Ardagh said Monday in a prepared statement. French giant Saint-Gobain is discussing the planned sale with unions ahead of a planned completion date later this year.

Verallia North America has about 4,400 employees at 13 manufacturing plants in the United States, including more than 650 workers in Indiana. The company has about 300 workers at its headquarters in Muncie and it also has a plant in Dunkirk, northeast of Muncie, where it employs more than 350.

“The acquisition of Verallia North America would be another important milestone in the evolution of Ardagh,” Chairman Paul Coulson said in a prepared statement.

Verallia will increase the size of Ardagh's glass business by 60 percent, and leave the U.S. accounting for 40 percent of its sales and earnings at a time when retail sales are on the increase. A housing-market rebound, higher stock prices and an improving job market are helping sustain consumer spending, which accounts for about 70 percent of the economy.

Verallia had sales of about $1.61 billion and an operating profit of $171 million in 2012.The company says it is the second-biggest maker of glass bottles and jars in the United States.

Ardagh plans to raise $1.45 billion in debt, denominated in both euro and dollar-denominated senior secured notes and senior notes to finance the purchase. Fourth-quarter sales increased by about 5 percent, with earnings “marginally higher,” the company said.

The acquisition is subject to regulatory approval.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.