NCAA called 'cartel' with top conferences in player suit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The National Collegiate Athletic Association and five top conferences are a “cartel” that generates billions of dollars in revenue and illegally caps the pay of student athletes, a group of football and basketball players claim in a lawsuit that seeks to reshape college sports.

Four athletes filed an antitrust complaint Monday on the eve of the NCAA men’s basketball tournament seeking to bar the association and five “power conferences” from enforcing rules that ban colleges from competing financially for players and limit payments to tuition and related fees.

The antitrust suit, if successful, may lead to bidding wars for top high-school talent. It joins a separate case, scheduled for trial in June, in which athletes seek to overturn an NCAA rule barring college players from profiting from their names, images and likenesses. Recent lawsuits over head injuries and scholarship caps also attack the Indianapolis-based NCAA.

“This is yet another danger to the current model of current athletics,” said Gabe Feldman, director of the Sports Law program at Tulane University in New Orleans. “This becomes an instantly credible threat to the NCAA.”

The players, including Clemson University football player Martin Jenkins and Rutgers University basketball player Johnathan Moore, sued the NCAA and the Southeastern, Big Ten, Pac-12, Atlantic Coast and Big-12 conferences in federal court in Trenton, N.J. They seek unspecified money damages for themselves and to overturn NCAA rules that apply to top football and men’s basketball programs at Division I schools including the universities of Alabama, Texas and Oregon and Duke University. The colleges weren’t sued.

NCAA spokeswoman Stacey Osburn declined to immediately comment on the lawsuit.

The proposed class-action, or group lawsuit, will “affect everything from recruiting on up,” the players’ lawyer, Winston & Strawn LLP partner Jeffrey Kessler, said in an interview.

The complaint takes aim at NCAA and conference rules that permit payments to players for only tuition, room, board, books and fees. College athletes may not otherwise get paid or benefit financially under the rules.

“Those restrictions have no legitimate pro-competitive justification,” according to the 45-page complaint.

College athletes generate more than $16 billion in television contracts for the NCAA and its conferences, as well as revenue from sponsorships, ticket and merchandise sales and payouts for championships, the plaintiffs said in their filing. The 65 schools in the conferences reported $5.15 billion in related revenue in 2011-12, much of it from long-term television broadcast contracts, according to the complaint.

Broken bodies

In 2010, the NCAA signed a 14-year, $11 billion agreement with CBS Corp. and Turner Sports Inc. to show the Division I men’s college basketball tournament. In 2012 Walt Disney Co.’s ESPN agreed to pay $5.64 billion over 12 years to broadcast a college football playoff that debuts this season. About 73 percent of the football playoff money will go to power conference teams, according to the complaint.

The NCAA and five conferences “earn billions of dollars in revenues each year through the hard work, sweat and sometimes broken bodies of top-tier college football and men’s basketball athletes,” according to the complaint.

The lawsuit is endorsed by the National College Players Association, which is seeking to become the collective bargaining voice of Northwestern University football players who last month asked the National Labor Relations Board to recognize them as school employees. It would be a step toward their becoming the first unionized U.S. college athletes.

“College athletes are more informed than they’ve ever been, more organized and more courageous,” Ramogi Huma, the NCPA’s executive director and a former University of California at Los Angeles football player, said. “They’re showing courage to challenge this multibillion-dollar industry.”

The complaint comes at a tumultuous time for the NCAA.

O’Bannon case

The association is the lone defendant remaining in a case brought by former UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon and other athletes who seek to profit over the use of their likeness in video games.

Last year, Electronic Arts Inc., the second-largest U.S. video-game publisher, agreed to pay $40 million to resolve the case. The NCAA and the former athletes have been ordered to hold settlement talks.

Separately, the NCAA is expected as early as April to reach an agreement to boost safeguards for college athletes who suffer concussions. A deal would mark a broadening of concerns over sports head injuries after former professional players struck a $914 million concussions pact with the National Football League.

Earlier this month, the NCAA and five conferences were sued in San Francisco by Shawne Alston, a former West Virginia University player who claims they conspired to limit the value of scholarships to less than the actual cost of attendance.

Caps pay

The latest case adds a new threat.

“Instead of permitting individual institutions to compete for the services of players who participate in their major college sports businesses, the NCAA and the power conferences act as a cartel in placing a cap on the athletes’ compensation,” Kessler said in a prepared statement.

Kessler, who has represented the unions in the four major U.S. sports leagues, previously litigated a case that brought free agency to the NFL.

Because the U.S. service academies and schools in the Ivy League don’t offer athletic scholarships, they aren’t part of the lawsuit, according to the complaint.


  • Standardize on NCAA Div III Criteria
    To make the standard truly "Student-Athletes", one can only hope that there is a chance to use the NCAA Division III criteria for all intercollegiate athletics. The University of Chicago had it right afterall.
  • Cry me a river
    I would love to have the problem of a 80-100k education given to me to play a sport that I love to play. If you don't like the terms don't play! Doubt anyone would ever do that though. Just shut up and don't be crybabies. That is what the NBA is full of.... Crybabies. These attorney's crack me up. I miss 20 years ago when the entitlement society was a small non factor. Just take your 100k education and shut up!
  • Monopoly would be a better word
    Monopoly is a better description with no rights for student athletes that are considered amateurs and the NCAA and a few other organizations making big bucks at their expense along with Coaching Staffs, Universities, and Apparel Manufacturers, not to mention Video Game Manufacturers. Perhaps a multi-Billion dollar fund should be set aside for those top athletes who make it on the College/University Football, Basketball teams and are injured or don't have a degree or make it to the big League of the NFL or NBA. These amateur athletes are used like professionals for advertising, promotion by the NCAA and Universities/Colleges in the pretense of providing scholarships for them while reaping millions and billions in pure profit for the NCAA, Universities, Colleges, Coaching and Sports support staff. Who pays for the football arenas and basketball arenas, the parents, students, and taxpayers. Perhaps the NCAA should share the money they make with the parents of the student athletes who have made the financial and personal sacrifices to get them to the big time in the NCAA and to the students who may be injured. No wonder good football players and basketball players leave school for their one chance rather than chance getting injured at the College University level with no future to show for it.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?