IBJNews

New Indiana schools chief: GOP approval unnecessary

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana's new superintendent of public instruction, Democrat Glenda Ritz, said she can make some policy changes for the state's schools without needing the approval of the Republican-controlled General Assembly and governor's office, but that she welcomes input, no matter where it comes from.

Ritz told The Times of Munster for a story Sunday that she has enough flexibility in the office to get schools "moving forward in a different direction."

She defeated Tony Bennett, the Republican incumbent, in the Nov. 7 election. Republican Gov.-elect Mike Pence said he didn't view her victory as a referendum on the education overhaul championed by Bennett and outgoing Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels.

"We ran on a platform of continuing a bold agenda of education reform ... and we've been given the opportunity to lead based on those ideas," Pence said at the time.

Ritz acknowledges she doesn't have enough votes in the Republican-dominated Legislature to make big policy changes, such as a repealing Indiana's private school voucher program, but she said she will be able to tweak them.

For example, Ritz said she plans to do away with the pass or fail test for third-grade reading competency implemented by Bennett and instead measure struggling students' progress after giving them intensive instruction.

She said that also applies to Bennett's emphasis on ISTEP-Plus standardized testing and the A-F grading system used to rate schools.

"I believe there's policy and implementation that goes in a different direction from what we're doing now," Ritz said.

Ritz wants the Indiana Department of Education to also do a better job supporting local schools instead of just telling them what to do.

"We're going to be doing quite a different approach, a real, real bottom-up approach in providing professional development, resources and any type of support that might be needed," Ritz said. "When you get memos from me regarding policy you will already know what it's about, because you will have been part of making the decision."

She also wants to hear from mayors and city councils, who she said also have major stakes in the quality of schools.

"We're going to be working with the community to make plans and put in motion action that will actually address the challenges," Ritz said.

Ritz said she's interested in working with Pence to implement his plan for added vocational and technical education in Indiana high schools.

She met with House and Senate leaders and the chairmen of both chambers' education committees last week and wants to hear lawmakers' ideas on improving education in Indiana classrooms.

"I don't really care what political party a legislator belongs to, I'll be working with everyone," Ritz said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Evaluating the Superintendent
    I think it's premature and unfair to state that the new Superintendent will not seek and use input from Republicans. How about evaluating her based on what she actually does? I do think it's clear she does not intend to be ordered around by Republicans...
  • Charter-school owners or Unions????
    In looking at the campaign contributions, from what I saw....Tony got money, money and more money from those who get State of Indiana money to run charter schools, school take-over programs, and testing system. Tony had, when I looked, I believe 1.4 million dollars. The Union PAC donation was under $200,000. I also note...(1)we have failing charter schools. (2) I don't believe the reporting on school students is always honest. (3) I don't judge schools or teachers on student scores. (4) I voted against Tony for his refusal to supply answers to public records requests. (Kind of like the hidden contract for Mitch to take a few more $$$$$$$$ from Purdue? If it is a good deal...why can't we see the contract?) Without unions, politicians select their friends and relatives to be teachers. While many foolishly believe schools would improve by making teachers work as serfs without pay; even they should believe that having politicians run the school employment would be a greater evil than Union labor...I hope?
  • a real, real bottom-up approach
    "I don't really care what political party a legislator belongs to, I'll be working with everyone," Ritz said. However, she makes it clear that she does not need--and therefore not want--Republican input. The only winners with Ritz in this office is the teacher's union.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT