IBJNews

New law helps protect seniors from unscrupulous relatives

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The state will soon have more authority to protect older Hoosiers whose family members are taking advantage of them for financial gain.

The General Assembly has expanded a senior protection law to cover situations that don’t meet the definition of theft or fall under other fraud laws.

The law—pushed by Attorney General Greg Zoeller—is meant to help seniors fight back against more subtle manipulation that happens when a caregiver, friend or loved one uses intimidation—but not force—to gain access to money, credit cards or other resources.

It takes effect on July 1.

“It means Hoosier senior citizens are more thoroughly safeguarded from these fraudulent claims and that a lifetime of savings and investments remain secure,” said the bill’s author, Sen. Tim Lanane, D-Anderson.

Already, state agencies can investigate insurance or financial fraud involving companies, while the attorney general handles other consumer protection cases involving transactions.

But Deputy Attorney General David Miller told lawmakers earlier this year that there remains a gap in cases that typically involve family and caregivers, who might threaten to stop helping, visiting or caring for seniors who won’t help them financially.

“We’re basically in a position where unless we can see that there’s actually been a theft of assets, we’re helpless to do anything,” Miller said.

Groups advocating for seniors—including the AARP and the Area Agencies on Aging—backed the law. The Adult Protective Services Agency reported that in 2011, seniors were the victims in 1,300 cases involving financial exploitation.

The numbers increased 80 percent between 2001 and 2011.

And a national survey by the nonprofit Investor Protection Trust found that financial fraud committed by family members and caregivers outpace those by strangers.

“We have seen an uptick in the number of our members who are victims of financially-devastating frauds, scams and intimidation ploys,” said Katie Moreau, spokeswoman for AARP Indiana. “This is particularly detrimental to seniors who don’t have the time to rebound from financial setbacks.”

She said the group plans to alert its 850,000 members statewide about the new law.

The new Indiana law allows the attorney general to file a civil action against a person who financially exploits a senior and allows the court to freeze his or her assets, issue an injunction to protect the senior, and order repayment and additional restitution.

A court can also order $5,000 fines, which can increase to $10,000 if a judge finds the violation was committee by a person the senior trusted.

Seniors who feel victimized—whether by deception or intimidation or other means—can contact the attorney general’s office, Adult Protective Services or local Area Agencies on Aging.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What If?
    This is awesome. Seniors are so vulnerable to family members. I personally know of 3 seniors who have been taken advantage of by family members within the last 6 months. Here's the problem though, what if the mental capacity of these seniors is such that they do not know that they are being taken advantage of? Can other people report the violators?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT