New roof to help stabilize historic Indy theater

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Rivoli Theatre, the huge, historic, decrepit movie theater on Indianapolis' near-east side, is getting a new roof and with it, new hope.

The building, at 3155 E. 10th Street, has been vacant since 1992 and is in an advanced state of disrepair. But a new roof will stabilize it, staving off further deterioration and, the building's backers hope, be the first step in revitalizing what was once the neighborhood's crown jewel.

Work has begun on the new roof, which will cover only the auditorium and stage areas, not the entire building, The Indianapolis Star reported. The job was supposed to have begun in March but was delayed by unforeseen structural problems and the need for more cash, said James Kelly, board president of the Rivoli Center for the Performing Arts Inc., the not-for-profit that owns the building.

Since early in the year, the group has had in hand a $300,000 Community Development Block Grant, federal money via the city. It was thought to be enough to cover expenses. But another $40,000 was needed, and that has now arrived via a loan from Indiana Landmarks, the historic preservation group.

A legal battle regarding ownership also slowed preservation efforts.

The storied Rivoli is considered a linchpin in the effort to revitalize the area. It was built in 1927 as an enormous and fancy single-screen movie house by Universal Pictures, with 1,500 seats, but now would be re-purposed into an arts-themed community center that would focus on youth and education. Plans for the Rivoli's future use are still vague. The focus for now is bricks-and-mortar.

With its fantastical architecture by Henry Ziegler Dietz, the Rivoli has for years been in the sights of local would-be preservationists. But after decades of deferred maintenance — the theater's interior looks like post-World War II Europe — that task has proved too daunting. There's been no progress.

But now there's progress. "It's really happening," said Kelly, who grew up in the neighborhood and attended movies and concerts at the Rivoli. "The train is pulling out of the station."

A long, difficult journey lies ahead, however. Kelly estimated it would take $5 million to rehab the building. His group so far has amassed just $10,000.


  • Is it really worth it?
    I'd love to see the Rivoli restored, simply from a preservationist standpoint and an anchor to a once vibrant area's history. But at this point, is it really worth it? There have been several announcements over the last 20 years or so that it was going to be rehabbed, but not much, if anything has been done in that time.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.