North of South project clears rezoning hurdle

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The downtown property where developers want to build a $155 million mixed-use project known as North of South won rezoning approval on Wednesday, but not without more resistance from nearby businesses.

Members of the Metropolitan Development Commission voted unanimously to rezone 14 acres of land—now home to a parking lot north of South Street between Delaware Street and Virginia Avenue downtown—to accommodate the project.

Locally based Buckingham Cos. is leading the development, set to be built on property owned by Eli Lilly and Co. The city is offering to provide an $86 million loan and build $9 million in infrastructure to get the project off the ground. Plans call for a boutique hotel, retail space, a YMCA and 320 upscale apartments.

But a handful of longtime area businesses, led by fabric wholesaler Mayer Paetz Inc. at 321 S. Alabama St., wants a commitment from developers that the project will not disturb right-of-way and on-street parking configurations.

Mayer Paetz is particularly concerned about semitrailers being able to access loading docks to make deliveries.

“What we have been looking for in these multiple meetings is an actual binding commitment,” the company’s attorney, Larry Whitham, told the commission. “We’re looking to you for guidance.”

Commission members, though, said they’re confident Buckingham will cooperate with Mayer Paetz to ensure semis have access to the docks, and work with businesses to make certain visitors have access to on-street parking.

Attorney Tim Ochs, representing the developer’s partnership known as NOS Innovation Partners, argued that right-of-way issues aren’t even relevant to a rezoning request.

“Nobody wants to see those businesses suffer,” he said. “But we’re entitled to [the street] just as much as they are. To have us make a commitment to property that we don’t own, it’s impractical—it’s impossible.”

Ochs said the proper city entity to air their grievances is to the Regional Center hearing examiner. Because the site is located within the Regional Center overlay district, its design needs to comply with Regional Center Urban Design guidelines.

The examiner is set to hear site plans Dec. 23, but a continuance could push it back to Jan. 13.

Earlier this month, the MDC approved a potential financing arrangement for the project involving the city.

The city is offering to provide the $86 million loan by issuing bonds and using income generated by the development to pay off the costs.
The $155 million price tag for the project includes the city loan and infrastructure-improvement pledge, as well as a $7 million contribution from Buckingham, a $6 million grant from the Indiana Economic Development Corp., the $29 million in land Lilly is donating and $18 million for the YMCA branch, which the YMCA will fund.



  • I'm hungry
    i hope they build a grocery store with plenty of parking near by. that's one reason i wont move downtown even though i would love to. i'm not going to cart a weeks worth of groceries 3 miles from o'malia's only to have them taken by thugs and/or bums that roam around in that area.
  • Great project
    I pay taxes in Marion County. I support this project.
  • Huh?
    Is this the same tea party member posting repeatedly about the same damn thing?!? We get it... you don't like the project or the financing. Get over it. It's happening. And some of us, who pay just as much in taxes as you, WANT it to happen. It's called progress - growth - and if you don't like it I suggest you pack up and head out. Peace!
  • Wake Up
    Lilly is not "donating" anything.

    This project is roughly 95% government financed with grants, bonds, & separate infrastructure improvements.

    Here are the deals finer details:

  • I hate the deal
    All I can say is that this is the deal that turned me against Greg Ballard. I voted for him. And I've been willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on other controversial matters like the water company deal and parking. But I don't approve of the way this was rammed through; I don't like the Indianapolis bond bank being used as a slush fund for politically motivated projects; I don't like Metropolitan Development rubber stamping these type of deals under the table with little interest in public sentiment; and I don't think we ought to indebt Indianapolis taxpaying residents with this financing when Lilly is perfectly capable of building out its own parking lots with its own money. Very few cities have bond banks. I think ours is being mismanaged. We're scraping by on libraries and IndyGo. Every million counts. And yet the mayor is free to unilaterally push through a hundred and fifty five million dollar project that taxpayers don't want using bond bank shenanigans. I don't like it a bit, and when Greg Ballard loses the next mayoral election I'll remember the day I turned against him.
  • Taking Advantage of the Holidays
    This project is screaming NO, yet the pleas are being ignored again.

    Its a government driven project that has little economic impact with few high paying, highly skilled jobs that drains shrinking public resources from more worthy projects.

    The banks rejected it and some amateur politicians think they know better for some less scrupulous reason.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?