IBJNews

Northside office complex might fetch more than $40M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A high-profile Carmel office complex near the North Meridian Street corridor that once housed the headquarters of Indianapolis developer Lauth Group Inc. is officially on the market.

Jones Lang LaSalle is listing the trio of buildings known as Meridian Corporate Plaza for owner LIP Holdings LLC, an affiliate of Chicago-based Inland American Real Estate Trust.

REW Meridian corporate plaza 15col Meridian Corporate Plaza is 92-percent leased, which should help it fetch bids between $130 and $150 per square foot. (Photo/Jones Lang LaSalle)

Inland, a former financial backer of Lauth's, took possession of the buildings as part of the bankruptcy reorganizaation of Lauth Investment Properties LLC, a Lauth Group affiliate whose bankruptcy reorganization wrapped up in 2011. Lauth Group since has moved its offices to The Congressional, a 181,000-square-foot office building at 116th Street and Pennsylvania Parkway in Carmel that it bought last year.

Meridian Corporate Plaza, located just north of Interstate 465 between Meridian Street and College Avenue, totals 329,546 square feet and is 92-percent leased, said Jim Postweiler, a manager director of Jones Lang LaSalle.

Jones Lang LaSalle is listing Meridian Corporate Plaza without a price and instead is opting to take bids in a call-for-offer process. Bids need to be in the range of $130 to $150 per square foot, Postweiler said, which would translate into a total price between about $43 million and $49 million.

The buildings' tenants include Guggenheim Insurance, Hartford Insurance, Belden Inc. and Blackbaud Inc.

“We’re excited about the opportunity to sell what amounts to a Class A stabilized package in the best location in the suburbs,” Postweiler said. “The health of the commercial office market is good and improving, and the attractiveness of Indianapolis to investors is good and improving.”

Jones Lang LaSalle is trying to get a higher price per square foot than other suburban office buildings have fetched in recent months, none of which has sold for more than $100 a square foot, said Darrin Boyd, managing director and principal of Cassidy Turley.

“It’s definitely on the high side of what’s traded in Indianapolis,” he said. “But it’s a property that should trade at a high price because it’s well-leased and it’s at a good location. It’s got a lot of good things going for it.”

Meridian Corporate Plaza’s 8-percent vacancy rate is far below the overall vacancy rate in the north Indianapolis/Carmel market, which stood at 20.2 percent in the first quarter, Cassidy Turley statistics show.

The asking rent for the complex of $22.50 per square foot is higher than the average rate of $18.27 rate for Class A office space throughout the entire Indianapolis market.

The complex’s three buildings range from three to four stories. The two newest buildings were finished in 2006 and 2007. To have such new product up for sale is unusual for the suburban market, said Dan Richardson, senior vice president for investment services at CBRE.

Most transactions in that market the past five years have been so-called “value-add” sales, he said, meaning investors could add value by increasing leasing activity or improving functions to make the properties more appealing.

“But this is stabilized,” Richardson said of Meridian Corporate Plaza. “It’s good product. So it’s going to attract a different type of buyer.”

Jones Lang LaSalle has yet to set a deadline for offers.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT