IBJNews

Not-for-profits urge lawmakers not to kill plates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Organizers from not-for-profit groups urged Indiana lawmakers Wednesday not to kill the sales of specialty license plates that raise some of their funding.

A legislative study committee heard about an hour of testimony from representatives of organizations as diverse as the Indianapolis Zoo, Bicycle Indiana and the Patriot Guard.

The proliferation of plates expressing support for everything from autism research to Abraham Lincoln became an issue last year when conservative lawmakers tried to eliminate a specialty plate for a gay youth group. Their push failed, but the Bureau of Motor Vehicles later stripped plate privileges from the Indiana Youth Group and two other organizations, saying they wrongly traded low-digit plates for contributions. The youth group maintains the practice is common.

No one from the group that provides support for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender teenagers who are struggling with their identities testified during Wednesday's hearing at the Statehouse. The group's director was on vacation and didn't return a phone call seeking comment.

Anne Teigen, a policy analyst with the National Conference of State Legislatures who spoke to the committee via video from Denver, said gay rights, racism, abortion and other contentious issues had surfaced over specialty plates in other states and that several states were reconsidering offering plates at all or setting stricter qualifications.

"Many states are wrestling with the issue, and there is a state of flux out there," said committee Chairman Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso.

Former state legislator and treasurer Joyce Brinkman urged lawmakers to issue the plates only to not-for-profits whose activities augment state services and to set up a system to regularly audit the groups.

While some lawmakers have suggested that the Legislature should approve which groups receive recognition plates, Gary Democratic Sen. Earline Rogers questioned that.

"I'm not sure that's something the Legislature should be doing, because sometimes politics comes in," she said.

Not-for-profit group leaders who testified Wednesday said the plate program was a legitimate public-private partnership and helps the organizations provide needed services that otherwise would have to be paid for by the state.

Motorists pay an additional $40 for the special plates, with $25 going the organization and $15 to the BMV. About 459,000 such plates are currently on vehicles — a number that has been consistent for several years, even as 39 new plates have been approved in the last six years.

"From the tax revenue standpoint, the specialty plate program is a win-win-win for the state of Indiana," said Charles Hyde, director of membership for the Indianapolis Zoo.

But most of the organizers said they would be receptive to tighter regulations, which committee members generally favored.

Soliday said Wednesday's hearing would likely be the only one before the panel reports to the Legislature, which is expected to take up the issue in January.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Let people vote with their wallets
    Hoosiers obviously support nonprofit license plates, since they're willing to pay not only $25 as a donation, but an extra $15 to the state for the privilege of helping others. The plates help financially, and they help raise awareness of whatever nonprofit the driver supports. I hope the legislature leaves the program alone!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT