IBJNews

Officials say bridge project can be changed

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Officials who want to build two new bridges over the Ohio River and redo a downtown interchange announced Thursday that they've found ways to cut the cost of the project by more than $1 billion.

The project joins Kentucky and Indiana in an effort that supporters from both states say is crucial to the region's economy.

"Building them as fast as we can using smart, cost-effective designs will produce the best value for taxpayers and motorists alike," said Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, who was unable to attend a news conference.

Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear and Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer were there and said savings had been found that would lower the estimated cost from $4.1 billion to $2.9 billion.

"We have brought it to a size and a scope that is doable," Beshear said.

The project includes a new span into downtown Louisville and one to the east that would connect Prospect, Ky., and Utica, Ind. It calls for rebuilding Louisville's Kennedy Interchange, a web of intertwined ramps commonly referred to as "Spaghetti Junction."

With the scaled-down costs, officials hoped to build more momentum for the long-planned project.

But Beshear said the possibility of using tolls to help pay for the new bridges remains "very much on the table."

For months, the panel charged with financing the project has floated the idea of tolls on new and existing bridges as a way to pay for the new spans and a redesign of the junction where interstates 64, 65 and 71 converge near downtown Louisville.

The prospect of tolls has drawn some public opposition. Paul Fetter, co-founder of a group that says it has collected thousands of signatures on petitions opposed to tolling, praised political leaders for shaving the project's costs

"We may possibly be at that point where I-65 may not need to be tolled," he said. "We will continue our efforts until that is achieved."

Beshear said no decisions have been made. Kentucky and Indiana officials will compare the slimmed-down plan to two other options.

But Beshear said he remains "dead serious about getting these bridges built," and said Daniels and Fischer are equally committed.

Fischer predicted that even deeper savings could be achieved. Low interest rates will lower borrowing costs, he said, and bidding should be hotly competitive among construction firms eager for a piece of the project.

"We've been talking about these bridges for far too long," Fischer said. "It's time for some action."

Officials have eyed starting construction of the new bridges in August 2012. Beshear conceded that's an aggressive start date but said "we've got to be aggressive."

The officials said Thursday that the biggest chunk of savings would come from rebuilding the Kennedy interchange in its current place rather than moving it to the south. That alone would save $800 million.

Design changes to Interstate 65 in Southern Indiana would yield another $215 million in savings, and reducing the East End bridge from six to four lanes would produce $174 million in savings, they said.

Kentucky Transportation Secretary Mike Hancock said projected traffic volumes show six lanes wouldn't be needed for a long time.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bridges
    A new bridge at Evansville/Henderson is needed more than it is at Louisville. The I-69 extension is going to create additional river crossing traffic and if the current bridge goes down then next closest is at Owenboro, 45 miles away.
  • bridge project
    ". . . reducing the East End bridge from six to four lanes . . ."

    How much will it cost to add the two lanes after traffic flows demand it?

    Sounds very penny-wise, pound-foolish to me.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.

ADVERTISEMENT