IBJNews

Officials say bridge project can be changed

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Officials who want to build two new bridges over the Ohio River and redo a downtown interchange announced Thursday that they've found ways to cut the cost of the project by more than $1 billion.

The project joins Kentucky and Indiana in an effort that supporters from both states say is crucial to the region's economy.

"Building them as fast as we can using smart, cost-effective designs will produce the best value for taxpayers and motorists alike," said Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, who was unable to attend a news conference.

Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear and Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer were there and said savings had been found that would lower the estimated cost from $4.1 billion to $2.9 billion.

"We have brought it to a size and a scope that is doable," Beshear said.

The project includes a new span into downtown Louisville and one to the east that would connect Prospect, Ky., and Utica, Ind. It calls for rebuilding Louisville's Kennedy Interchange, a web of intertwined ramps commonly referred to as "Spaghetti Junction."

With the scaled-down costs, officials hoped to build more momentum for the long-planned project.

But Beshear said the possibility of using tolls to help pay for the new bridges remains "very much on the table."

For months, the panel charged with financing the project has floated the idea of tolls on new and existing bridges as a way to pay for the new spans and a redesign of the junction where interstates 64, 65 and 71 converge near downtown Louisville.

The prospect of tolls has drawn some public opposition. Paul Fetter, co-founder of a group that says it has collected thousands of signatures on petitions opposed to tolling, praised political leaders for shaving the project's costs

"We may possibly be at that point where I-65 may not need to be tolled," he said. "We will continue our efforts until that is achieved."

Beshear said no decisions have been made. Kentucky and Indiana officials will compare the slimmed-down plan to two other options.

But Beshear said he remains "dead serious about getting these bridges built," and said Daniels and Fischer are equally committed.

Fischer predicted that even deeper savings could be achieved. Low interest rates will lower borrowing costs, he said, and bidding should be hotly competitive among construction firms eager for a piece of the project.

"We've been talking about these bridges for far too long," Fischer said. "It's time for some action."

Officials have eyed starting construction of the new bridges in August 2012. Beshear conceded that's an aggressive start date but said "we've got to be aggressive."

The officials said Thursday that the biggest chunk of savings would come from rebuilding the Kennedy interchange in its current place rather than moving it to the south. That alone would save $800 million.

Design changes to Interstate 65 in Southern Indiana would yield another $215 million in savings, and reducing the East End bridge from six to four lanes would produce $174 million in savings, they said.

Kentucky Transportation Secretary Mike Hancock said projected traffic volumes show six lanes wouldn't be needed for a long time.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bridges
    A new bridge at Evansville/Henderson is needed more than it is at Louisville. The I-69 extension is going to create additional river crossing traffic and if the current bridge goes down then next closest is at Owenboro, 45 miles away.
  • bridge project
    ". . . reducing the East End bridge from six to four lanes . . ."

    How much will it cost to add the two lanes after traffic flows demand it?

    Sounds very penny-wise, pound-foolish to me.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT