IBJNews

Old National name to adorn Murat for three years

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The century-old Murat Centre will be named the Old National Centre for the next three years.

Event promoter Live Nation on Tuesday put the new name in royal blue lettering above the marquee of the entertainment venue downtown. Evansville-based Old National Bank's name, logo and colors also will be emblazoned on entrance awnings, posters, video screens and even the drink menu behind the bar. And tickets that go on sale later this month will be printed with the new name.

Close to 400,000 people a year walk through the building's doors, said Kelly Ford, director of sponsorship sales for Live Nation in Indianapolis. Live Nation manages the former Murat Centre under a long-term lease. It also manages The Lawn at White River State Park and owns Verizon Wireless Music Center in Noblesville.

Live Nation and Old National executives would not disclose the value of the deal, first reported Monday on IBJ.com. Randy Reichmann, CEO of the bank's Indianapolis region, said he expects the relationship to last longer than the initial three-year contract. The bank is trying to gain market share in Indianapolis since acquiring 65 former Charter One branches a year ago.

"What we're hoping to drive is just more awareness of Old National Bank," Reichmann said.

Although Live Nation has more than 40 title sponsors at venues across the country, Ford said the local management team hasn't aggressively pursued a naming-rights deal. "Knowing this is a historic theater, you want to have the right partner," she said.

Ford said the deal with Old National sprang out of a regular lunch meeting to talk about marketing plans for 2010. The bank is already a sponsor at Verizon Wireless Music Center.

Reichmann, an avid concertgoer, said the relationship with Live Nation has worked well so far. In the past, the bank gave away free ticket vouchers to customers opening new checking accounts. He said he expects to leverage the sponsorship at Old National Centre in a similar fashion. 

The venues inside Old National Centre will retain their original names: Murat Theatre, Egyptian Room, Corinthian Hall, Grand Lobby and Crowne Room. The theater seats 2,500. The capacity of all venues combined is 4,515.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • MJ
    Thank you for reminding me that Sears Tower was a corporate name already. You missed my point, but I'll gladly let you feel better by pointing out a fact that had nothing to do with what I said.
  • Interesting...
    I don't disagree with the sentiment and the desire to keep the old name. But Dustin, you do realize the Sears Tower was a corporate name already, right?? It just shows that it has more to do with losing what we're used to than the 'corporateness' of the name.
  • Murat
    I think this is ridiculous. The name of this venue is actually part of it's historic fabric. The whole "corporate branding" thing is so far out of hand anyway. Why not make it "The Old National Bank's Murat Center" or something like that.
  • Not a fan
    Old National should have kept their hands out of this one. Keep the Murat name alive.
  • Sickening
    How pathetic and lame. I used to live near the Murat and always thought the name itself was actually a PART of the building's history and never ever imagined the name being stripped and replaced with a cheesy, bland, and stupid corporate sounding name. It's just like the Sears Tower being renamed to Willis. There's no charm or uniqueness about it anymore...

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT