IBJNews

Opera chief: Group won't fold

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Opera is staring down a $400,000 budget gap, but Executive Director John Pickett says the company isn't folding.

"We don't want to give any indication the company is going out of business at all," he said Friday morning.

The opera on Thursday said it would cancel its third production of the season, Gilbert and Sullivan's "The Mikado," which was scheduled for March 19 and 21 at Clowes Memorial Hall. The opera is billing the move as a "postponement," saying it will schedule the same show for next season, which begins in the fall.

Ticket holders and subscribers will be offered credit for a rescheduled performance, or a refund. As a third option, the value of the tickets could be counted as an immediate, tax-deductible donation.

Cancellation of "The Mikado" will also impact Clowes, the Indianapolis Chamber Orchestra and various contracted singers. The show was also supposed to include participants in the opera's young artists program. Pickett said his artistic team is working to replace the young artists' performance with a smaller, low-budget show that can be staged at the Basile Opera Center, the former Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Church.

Cutting "The Mikado," a $275,000 production, will save the opera about $150,000. The difference includes deposits and other expenses that cannot be recovered. Pickett said he'll be looking for other budget cuts and new donations to cover the remaining shortfall.

In the worst-case scenario, Pickett said the opera could tap the assets of its small endowment. He's also hoping for a sale of the opera's office building at 250 E. 38th St.

Indianapolis Opera had already reduced its current season from four shows to three. Then grants that were figured into the current $2.65 million budget didn't materialize or were reduced. Pickett declined to discuss details of the grants because, he said, the grant makers are still very supportive of the opera.

The budget crunch prompted the board of directors to issue a $40,000 matching gift challenge in November. The fund-raising letter that Chairman Garry Fredericksen sent out at the time said the company was in a “battle for survival.”

The campaign was successful, Pickett said, but it wasn't enough to close the budget gap.

"We have some challenges in front of us," Pickett said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT