IBJNews

Pence plans more charters, road money for 2014

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence plans to spend his second meeting with the General Assembly advancing a legislative agenda centered on expanding the number of charter schools, finding ways to pay for road projects and seeking new tax cuts.

"As we were working through the summer and this fall in developing that agenda, it's about building on the momentum. We're looking at more pro-growth tax relief, particularly focused on encouraging investment in industry in Indiana," Pence told The Associated Press.

Pence talked about his plans for next year during a meeting of The Republican Governors Association in Scottsdale, Ariz. He heads into his second year as governor with strong support from Republican supermajorities in the House and Senate and a handful of victories from his limited agenda during his first year in office.

But he has also had trouble pushing through tax cuts before and is in the midst of a power struggle with Democratic Superintendent of Public Instruction Glenda Ritz, which lawmakers have said they might need to clear up. Meanwhile, the fight over amending the state's gay marriage ban into the constitution threatens to distract from other items during next year's two-month-long session.

Pence spokeswoman Christy Denault wouldn't provide specifics of the governor's agenda Thursday, but he's expected to release more details next month. The broad strokes of Pence's plan, however, are similar to what Republican legislative leaders say they want to focus on.

House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, and Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, both said this week they would like to eliminate the state's personal property tax, which is levied on business equipment and machines. Pence did not specify cutting that tax, but hinted at it with his statement about supporting industry.

The state's top lawmakers also said they would like to expand early childhood education, something Pence mentioned as well.

On education, he said he would like to expand the number of charter schools and improve flexibility for teachers who score well on their performance reviews, but did not give specifics. The specifics of the state's education debate have become increasingly important over the past year.

Pence campaigned last year on improving coordination between schools and employers, but never mentioned he would create a new agency to accomplish that. That new agency, which is staffed in part with Ritz's political rivals, has become the focus of the latest education feud.

Winning a tax cut, even in the Republican-dominated General Assembly, could prove tricky as well. David Bottorff, executive director of the Association of Indiana Counties, said there's widespread concern among local leaders that the newest tax-cut proposal could force them to cut more services.

If counties have to make up budget shortfalls caused by the elimination of the personal property tax, they may look to raise taxes elsewhere, including on homeowners, he said.

"There's more and more stress on the system, because people don't want to have to pay the tax," he said.

But Pence and legislative leaders could sweeten the pot for local leaders with more funding for roads and new transportation projects.

"We have a blue ribbon panel that I set up to plan the future of transportation in Indiana, 25 years out, 50 years out. But we're also going to look for resources to plow back into infrastructure in the short term," Pence said.

Lawmakers made some significant changes to the tax code earlier this year, which helped add funding for roads, but the state still needs something close to $2 billion annually to maintain roads and construct new ones, said David Holt, vice president of Conexus Indiana.

Lawmakers have already floated the idea of looking at how to collect taxes not based on gasoline consumption, but based on the number of miles driven by each car. They also will have a raft of recommended projects come in from Pence's transportation group to consider for funding.

Holt, who is also working with Pence's transportation panel, cautioned that some ideas may only be discussed during the upcoming session, and acted on during the 2015 budget-writing session.

"It's an incredibly important debate," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Mute point
    Fuel consumption is influenced by the mileage you drive. The more you drive, the more fuel you consume. While electric vehicles do not consume fuel, they are a small percentage of market share in Indiana. I do like your point of taxing larger vehicles more because their weight causes more wear and tear on the roads.
  • No mile tax
    For now, the per-mile tax is a terrible idea. It wouldn't be a good idea unless 70% of all cars are electric. If you argue that pickup trucks cause more wear and tear on the road so they should be taxed per mile, you're wrong. 90% of pickup trucks have street tires and don't weight enough to tear up the road with the tires. However, I wouldn't mind having a mile tax for semi-trucks (but we need to make sure that it won't stop trucks from driving through the state.)
  • mileage tax
    I think it makes a lot of sense to start taxing people by the # of miles they drive as opposed to the number of gallons of gas they use. More and more people are getting electric cars. Should they not be taxed for using our roads? Taxing by mileage seems like a fair usage charge. (And bigger vehicles like trucks should be charged more per mile that they drive because they cause more wear and tear on the roads -- a LOT more.)
    • BIG thinking
      "We have a blue ribbon panel that I set up to plan the future of transportation in Indiana, 25 years out, 50 years out. But we're also going to look for resources to plow back into infrastructure in the short term," Pence said. New ideas include making sure no driveway is more than 30 feet away from a four lane highway.
    • What now?
      "Lawmakers have already floated the idea of looking at how to collect taxes not based on gasoline consumption, but based on the number of miles driven by each car." In the big book of bad ideas, I think this was on the first page.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

    ADVERTISEMENT