IBJNews

Pence seeks tax cut; Gregg equal pay for women

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Pence proposed a fiscal plan Tuesday that would cut income taxes while locking in tight spending levels set by Gov. Mitch Daniels and state lawmakers during the recession.

Pence estimates the measure would cost the state roughly $533 million a year and eat up much of an assumed cash surplus over the next two years. Pence added that the additional money from the surplus should be banked in the state's savings.

"I think the next governor of Indiana has to say no to government and yes to taxpayers," Pence said Tuesday, after detailing his proposal in a speech to the Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce.

Tax cuts have long been talked about in the governor's race. Democrat John Gregg's first detailed proposal, released in April, called for eliminating the state's sales tax on gasoline, which is levied in addition to the state's gas tax. Gregg later called for eliminating the corporate income tax on businesses physically headquartered in Indiana.

"We've been talking about tax cuts for months so we're happy to see the congressman has joined us," Gregg said on a conference call with reporters Tuesday.

Earlier in the day, Gregg said he would promote equal pay for women by honoring businesses that pay equally with a designation from the state, create new opportunities for those businesses and establish a hotline to report suspected pay discrimination.

Libertarian candidate Rupert Boneham plans to release his tax plan "in the coming weeks," said campaign manager Evan McMahon.

"Rupert's plan will do more than save the average Hoosier worker $2-4 a week, Pence's plan won't even get you a weekly $5 foot-long (sandwich) for lunch," McMahon said.

Any of the candidates' proposals to cut taxes next year would build off of the state's cash reserves, estimated at $2.2 billion, and an expected surplus of roughly $500 million a year. The state already returns a certain portion of cash reserves to taxpayers and to the state teacher pension fund to pay down unfunded liabilities, but Pence's plan would overtake both those measures.

Conservative governors in Oklahoma and Kansas have struggled to push more income tax cut through their statehouses. Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin attempted without success to eliminate the state's income tax, while Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback won a rollback of the income tax but could not find the votes to approve the series of tax maneuvers he said would pay for the cut.

Additional pressure will be on Indiana lawmakers to restore education cuts made during the recession to the next biennial budget and find new ways to pay for transportation projects as money from Daniels' leasing of the Indiana Toll Road dwindles.

"Clearly, we've got a problem of funding our transportation maintenance budget. And Indiana being the crossroads of America, that's pretty critical thing to keep funded," said Senate budget leader Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville.

Kenley questioned the Pence campaign's estimate that the state will continue to see a budget surplus over the next few years. He noted that surpluses and deficits are fleeting and can disappear depending on how the economy performs.

The Pence campaign built its estimates assuming Indiana's tax collections improve by 2.5 percent each year, while they assume spending would increase by 1.5 percent annually.

State budget leaders are scheduled in December to get a set of new economic forecasts, which will be the starting point for writing Indiana's next budget.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT