IBJNews

Pendleton Pike Kmart, Anderson Sears on closing list

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Sears Holding Co. said it will close a Kmart store on Pendleton Pike in Indianapolis and a Sears department store in Anderson.

The stores are on a list of 79 closings the Hoffman Estates, Ill.-based retailer released Thursday afternoon. Sears on Tuesday said it planned to close from 100 to 120 of its Sears and Kmart stores, but did not reveal the actual store locations.

Sears did not say when the closings would take place.

The local Kmart is at 7201 Pendleton Pike and is the anchor tenant for Pendleton Plaza.

Indianapolis has four other Kmarts: at 2715 Madison Avenue; 7425 E. Washington St.; 5101 E. Thompson Road; and 6780 W. Washington St.

The Sears store set to close in Anderson is one of two anchor tenants for Mounds Mall, which opened in 1965 as one of the first enclosed shopping centers in Indiana. The mall also has a Carson's store.

Sears Holdings said additional closings would be announced when they are determined.

The only other Indiana store on the closing list is a Kmart in St. John, in the northwest part of the state.

Only 25 of the 79 properties on the closing list are full-line Sears stores. The list also contains 38 Kmarts, 14 Sears Grand/Essentials and two Sears Hardlines.

Florida will be hit the hardest by the closings, losing 11 stores. Ohio, Michigan and Georgia are not far behind with six store closures planned in their states. Tennessee, North Carolina and Minnesota are set to lose four stores each.

A spokeswoman for Sears Holding said each store employs between 40 and 80 people.

None of the closures announced so far are in Sears' home state of Illinois.

The projected closings represent only about 3 percent of Sears Holdings' U.S. stores. Sears and Kmart merged in 2005. The company now has about 3,560 stores in the U.S. That's up from 3,500 immediately after the merger.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT