IBJNews

Plan to run fiber optic lines along greenways has legal hurdles

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city is looking at wringing greenbacks out of its greenways, possibly making them accessible to fiber optic networks to bury cables alongside the hiking and biking trails.

But at least some of the potential arrangements could pose legal problems and dissuade telecommunications firms from offering proposals, according to an industry trade group.

A request for ideas issued June 16 envisions scenarios that could include franchise arrangements, rights-of-way leases and revenue-sharing concepts.

For its part, the city hopes to lasso cash to help offset the cost of maintaining and expanding its roughly 60 miles of greenway trails in Marion County.  

To the extent a more robust fiber network could improve broadband service, the city could also benefit from additional economic development.

“We’re really at the exploration stage to just find out whether there is even any interest in this,” said Kurt Fullbeck, an assistant to Mayor Greg Ballard.

Responses to the city's request are due by July 30.

But utility companies are wary over litigation that erupted over the last decade involving rights of way use. One case involved the city of Gary's attempting to charge millions of dollars in fees to AT&T’s Indiana unit for occupying public rights of ways it had used for decades.

The telecommunications company ultimately prevailed after an Indiana Supreme Court ruling in its favor.

Municipalities retain the right to impose certain fees for managing a public right of way on a non-discriminatory basis but are blocked from issuing certain types of leasing rights.

“We think that it’s a nice offer, a nice thing the city is attempting to do. But in terms of payment of lease rates we have some issue with that,” said John Koppin, president of the Indiana Telecommunications Association.

Koppin, after reading the city’s request, said: “I think they would have a problem legally.”

That’s not to say the city couldn’t fashion something creative that addresses legal concerns. Koppin said he didn’t immediately know what corridors of the city’s greenway network could potentially be popular to telecommunications providers looking to fill a gap in service.

For years, Indianapolis has been ringed by numerous fiber networks. Companies have been trying to close so-called last mile gaps that exist between buildings and the loops that rely on slower, less-capable copper cables.

Some of the ideas have been down in the gutter—literally. In 2001 the city, under Ballard predecessor Bart Peterson, invited CityNet Telecommunications to deploy fiber optic lines through the city’s sewer system, which linked additional buildings to the fiber loop for voice and data.

Whatever, if anything, the city can structure around its greenway system to open it to telecom access, “the biggest challenge now is we don’t’ have the perception we’re tearing up greenways,” Fullbeck said.

“We have to make sure everybody can still enjoy the trail.”

The fiber lines could provide benefits to users such as the ability to transmit security camera images to better monitor trails.

Ballard has been a proponent of expanding the greenway system for uses such as walking and biking. In the last two years, he directed construction of six new miles of trails. Five more are planned in 2011.

The recent request left the door open to other uses.

“The city is also interested in hearing alternative scenarios for the use of greenways space, and would encourage firms to submit alternative scenarios, other than a fiber optic network.”


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT