IBJNews

Plan to run fiber optic lines along greenways has legal hurdles

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The city is looking at wringing greenbacks out of its greenways, possibly making them accessible to fiber optic networks to bury cables alongside the hiking and biking trails.

But at least some of the potential arrangements could pose legal problems and dissuade telecommunications firms from offering proposals, according to an industry trade group.

A request for ideas issued June 16 envisions scenarios that could include franchise arrangements, rights-of-way leases and revenue-sharing concepts.

For its part, the city hopes to lasso cash to help offset the cost of maintaining and expanding its roughly 60 miles of greenway trails in Marion County.  

To the extent a more robust fiber network could improve broadband service, the city could also benefit from additional economic development.

“We’re really at the exploration stage to just find out whether there is even any interest in this,” said Kurt Fullbeck, an assistant to Mayor Greg Ballard.

Responses to the city's request are due by July 30.

But utility companies are wary over litigation that erupted over the last decade involving rights of way use. One case involved the city of Gary's attempting to charge millions of dollars in fees to AT&T’s Indiana unit for occupying public rights of ways it had used for decades.

The telecommunications company ultimately prevailed after an Indiana Supreme Court ruling in its favor.

Municipalities retain the right to impose certain fees for managing a public right of way on a non-discriminatory basis but are blocked from issuing certain types of leasing rights.

“We think that it’s a nice offer, a nice thing the city is attempting to do. But in terms of payment of lease rates we have some issue with that,” said John Koppin, president of the Indiana Telecommunications Association.

Koppin, after reading the city’s request, said: “I think they would have a problem legally.”

That’s not to say the city couldn’t fashion something creative that addresses legal concerns. Koppin said he didn’t immediately know what corridors of the city’s greenway network could potentially be popular to telecommunications providers looking to fill a gap in service.

For years, Indianapolis has been ringed by numerous fiber networks. Companies have been trying to close so-called last mile gaps that exist between buildings and the loops that rely on slower, less-capable copper cables.

Some of the ideas have been down in the gutter—literally. In 2001 the city, under Ballard predecessor Bart Peterson, invited CityNet Telecommunications to deploy fiber optic lines through the city’s sewer system, which linked additional buildings to the fiber loop for voice and data.

Whatever, if anything, the city can structure around its greenway system to open it to telecom access, “the biggest challenge now is we don’t’ have the perception we’re tearing up greenways,” Fullbeck said.

“We have to make sure everybody can still enjoy the trail.”

The fiber lines could provide benefits to users such as the ability to transmit security camera images to better monitor trails.

Ballard has been a proponent of expanding the greenway system for uses such as walking and biking. In the last two years, he directed construction of six new miles of trails. Five more are planned in 2011.

The recent request left the door open to other uses.

“The city is also interested in hearing alternative scenarios for the use of greenways space, and would encourage firms to submit alternative scenarios, other than a fiber optic network.”


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. RKW's comments read like a modern "Chicken Little". As a Raintree resident for many years, "Yes, I'm ready for this." Matter of fact, I welcome The Farm because it's a development that compliments our town, brings new and desirable shopping & dining closer (specialty grocer, upscale shops, micro brew pub, etc), offers upscale condos for empty nesters who want to stay in Zionsville, is being planned and constructed by local, well-reputed firms and, of course, provides desirable non property tax benefits. We all knew the Pittman's were going to develop their property sooner than later. That one of the Pittman's will continue to live on the property helps assure The Farm will be everything promised. This also sets a standard for other developers as to the quality of future developments - which should keep an ugly Walmart at bay for decades. As we've no meglomaniac mayor, I seriously doubt Zionsville would ever aspire to over-priced statues or subsidized retail rents. And we already have a very nice public theater, the Zionsville Performing Arts Center, that meets our cultural needs quite nicely.

  2. Do we add (or subtract) these from the bounty we recieve from RTWFL, Daylight Savings Time, corporate tax giveaways, and the crack job IEDC is doing?? Or is Mike going to blame these on Mitch?

  3. Who makes Tater Tots? They would be a good sponsor, because $3 Million for the alleged "Greatest Spectacle In Racing" is taters. Tiny, tiny taters. But at least they are making up something of the losses accumulated over the years in this dying sport. Buttock in seat is certainly not doing it, nor eyeball on TV, as evidenced by the lack of both.

  4. We loved lakehouse and think the Arbor Village would be a great location. It is less than 2 miles from over 1000 rooftops in the 225,000 to over 1 million range. Many people could use the great fishers trail system to bike or walk there. Just an idea Scotty -- but maybe something closer to 3 Wiseman would good. The only microbrew in area is Ram (boring)

  5. True, it's an ESPN production, but ESPN is just another name for ABC Sports, or what used to be ABC Sports since ABC Sports no longer exists as a name. ESPN=ABC Sports= ESPN. ESPN is, according to Forbes "the world's most valuable media property" worth $40 billion. Despite that, they fired 400 people this week.

ADVERTISEMENT