Plunging corn prices bring new strategies on farms

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With a field full of variables to constantly contend with, the one thing certain about farming is uncertainty.

But one aspect appears to be firming up solidly - and it's not good news.

A glut of corn is driving prices in the wrong direction, and with demand down and costs up, farmers are already considering their strategies for spring.

"We're probably going to plant more soybeans than we normally would," said Tom Fellerman, who farms about 1,300 acres of corn, soybeans and wheat in Hancock County.

In its updated November tally, the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimated the 2013 U.S. corn crop at just under 14 billion bushels, 7 percent higher than the previous record crop of 13.2 billion bushels harvested in 2009.

Last year's average yield of 160.4 bushels per acre was the second-highest on record behind 2009's average of 165.2 bushels per acre, according to the Daily Reporter of Greenfield.

Unfortunately, Indiana farmers are not being rewarded for their production.

With last year's crop up some 30 percent over 2012's drought-ravaged season, corn futures have plummeted from that year's record high of $8.49 per bushel to what analysts now predict will be in the mid-$4 range or below. That means farmers will be lucky to make money on his year's corn crop absent a significant weather or agricultural event in some other part of the corn-producing world.

Local farmers say they're already at their break-even point for corn, and with rising costs such as fertilizer and seed, the shift to another crop makes sense.

Last week, The Associated Press reported a December survey of 1,600 farmers by ag publication Farm Futures indicated a coming 3-percent reduction in corn acreage from last year, with a nearly 8-percent hike in acreage for soybeans.

Jim Cherry, who farms corn and soybeans on about 3,000 acres, agrees that more beans will be planted primarily because lower costs for that crop will allow for a better margin at harvest.

Over the past few years, rising corn prices drew many farmers into corn. Now, increased production is pairing with increased costs to bring the market back to baseline.

"Corn (prices) got too high a couple of years ago, and that wasn't good for anybody," Cherry said. "The biggest problem is that our input costs have gone up. Nitrogen has gone higher the last couple years, and rents have gone up."

If corn prices climbed to $5 a bushel, Cherry said, farmers could make that work, "but that's not going to happen, so we'll just have to figure out how to make a living at $4 to $4.25 (per bushel), he said.

During a late December presentation in Greenfield, Chris Hurt, a Purdue professor of agriculture economics, told local farmers 2014 would be a "real transition year," with farm incomes generally experiencing a flattening trend.

That readjustment will affect more than just corn farmers as declining farm revenues will impact everything from land rents and values to supply-side sectors like fertilizer providers and machinery.

"I think implement dealers might have some trouble selling iron this season," Cherry said.

Ted Smith, owner in charge of agriculture sales for Smith Implements Inc. in Greenfield, agrees.

"Eventually, it could have a devastating effect," Smith said. "The usual cycle is from new (machinery) to used and back to new equipment, and there's a pretty big buildup of used equipment right now.

"We had four pretty good years there, and frankly the farmers had gotten used to that. I think this is going to have a negative effect on a lot of implement dealers."

Across the board, farmers and those who sell to them say sharpening pencils and working on cost reductions will be critical as the corn prices drive down.

However, this is January's agricultural crystal ball, and as every farmer who's done it long enough knows, fortunes can change significantly for the spring and beyond.

Fellerman said if the weather is poor during the planting season and prices continue to drop, a lot more farmers could be switching to soybeans. That might then level out prices for that crop, which analysts predict will remain steady or rise slightly.

"You really don't know what's going to happen. I'm afraid corn and beans both will become unprofitable," said Joe Paxton, who farms 2,000 acres and plans on staying the course with corn.

"I know a lot of guys who are switching to beans, but I'm going to stick with my original plan and keep things the same," Paxton said.

"Hindsight is 20-20, and there's still a lot of guessing going on."


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1