IBJNews

Poll: Anthem so-so in customer satisfaction

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield ranked No. 12 in a new national customer satisfaction survey, but the poor showing doesn’t appear to threaten the Indianapolis-based company’s business success.

The ranking, based on a 4,500-customer survey by Insure.com, shows Anthem lagging such competitors as Louisville-based Humana Inc. and Minnesota-based UnitedHealthcare.

Even so, a slightly higher percentage of Anthem customers said they would renew their business with Anthem than did the customers of Humana and UnitedHealthcare.

Anthem received an overall satisfaction score of 78.3 percent, a tick behind UnitedHealthcare at 78.7 percent. Humana scored 81.9 percent.

The scores are based on consumer ratings in five categories: service, claims experience, value, percent who would recommend the company, and percent who plan to renew.

On that last category, 91 percent of Anthem customers said they would renew, compared with 90 percent for UnitedHealthcare and 84 percent for Humana.

If Anthem has any company to worry about, it’s Philadelphia-based Cigna Corp. While Cigna scored 76.2 on customer satisfaction, 93 percent of its customers said they would renew.

Anthem, a subsidiary of Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., operates Blue Cross or Blue Shield health insurance plans in 14 states, including Indiana. Overall, WellPoint provides health benefits to more Americans—33 million—than any other company.

In Indiana, Anthem is far and away the market leader, especially when it comes to commercial health insurance. Among employers and individuals actually buying full insurance, Anthem holds more than 60 percent of the market.

However, Anthem’s market share is lower among employers that fund their own benefits and instead hire insurance companies to be their claims processors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT